Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnBerger
State prosecutors have said only that Elliott?s belief is not relevant to Nichols? preliminary hearing.
Wow, so the prosecutors can pick and choose what testimony they like.
Everyday I have less and less faith in the FBI. Can't find their man? Well he simply didn't exist then.
4 posted on 05/08/2003 6:47:07 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lelio
That's not quite fair.

Nichols' guilt or innocence is based on his actions and his actions alone. The fact that McVeigh may have been accompanied by someone when he got the truck really doesn't have any bearing on whether or not Nichols was involved. The prosecutors are not trying to say that Nichols was there at the time. If they were, and he didn't match the description, then it would be relevant.
13 posted on 05/08/2003 7:31:36 AM PDT by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson