[sharktrager]

That's not quite fair.

Nichols' guilt or innocence is based on his actions and his actions alone. The fact that McVeigh may have been accompanied by someone when he got the truck really doesn't have any bearing on whether or not Nichols was involved. The prosecutors are not trying to say that Nichols was there at the time. If they were, and he didn't match the description, then it would be relevant.

[MizSterious]

Nichols was involved. I don't think anyone is disputing that. I also don't think anyone disputes the fact that McVeigh was guilty as sin itself. What a lot of us want is justice: we want them all caught and punished. I don't think we should stop with just those two if more were involved--and the evidence points in that direction.