Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A stealth attack on wilderness
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 5/7/03 | AJC Editorial

Posted on 05/07/2003 10:24:08 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Let me see if I understand this correctly, Bill Clinton, Bruce Babbit and Katie McGinty established this administration policy in order to illegally create the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument for a $500,000 soft money campaign contribution in 1995/96, but that was seemingly fine with the AJC Editorial Board.
"An article in Monday's Washington Times quoted Secretary Babbitt as having said the following: Quote, 'We switched the rules on the game. We are not trying to do anything legislatively.'"
Yet, now it's a bad thing.

Why is it that the big city liberal editorial boards are the ones who want to require all the non-urban dwellers to live like luddites among the wolves?

To quote from David Horsey's Red and Blue Americans:

"In Blue America, folks go to sleep content that wilderness a THOUSAND miles away has been set aside by the federal government..."

"In Red America, folks lie awake incensed that wilderness FIVE miles away has been set aside by the federal government."

1 posted on 05/07/2003 10:24:09 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
The chutzpah of Eastern liberals telling Westerners how to manage their lands. Its about time the Federal Government's stewardship of Western lands came to a close. The people closest to the land will take better care of it than Washington bureaucrats and the Atlanta Constitution-Journal can shove it.
2 posted on 05/07/2003 10:29:15 PM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
In fact, Norton notified only a few select U.S. senators when she decided to reverse four decades of established environmental policy on Bureau of Land Management lands.

Here's how that policy had worked: Under the 1976 Federal Land Policy and Management Act...

Nothing like putting a little deception into the editorial. First, the writer of the editorial makes it sound like this law was enacted during the Kennedy Administration, then we find out the law was actually enacted in the mid-70's. Technically, the law has existed in four decades, but it is not 40-years old, as the writer of the editorial would have you think.

If they can't be honest with even a minute detail such as this, why in the world should we pay attention to the media at all?

3 posted on 05/07/2003 10:37:46 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (np Richard Thompson, "The Old Kit Bag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Applause for Norton! The federal government has grabbed far too much land FROM the American people and placed it in a status that can never be enjoyed in any manner. The greenies are pissed because their perpetual land grabbing has been halted.
4 posted on 05/07/2003 10:38:00 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
There's only one problem: She forgot to ask the landowners -- the American people -- about it.

Oh yeah? Well, nobody bothered asking us Alaskans about locking up most of the state, nor did anyone ask us about locking up ANWR and halting oil exploration. I'm tired of Yankees 5000 miles away trying to tell us how to live up here. We can manage quite well without Washington's interference in our lives and in our state.

5 posted on 05/07/2003 10:43:09 PM PDT by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
We have enough wilderness already.
6 posted on 05/08/2003 12:56:59 AM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The on-line forum at the AJC was overwhelmingly for more wilderness - almost as though it had been "FReep'd" by the enviro-whackos.
7 posted on 05/08/2003 7:48:49 AM PDT by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists; *landgrab; madfly; farmfriend
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
8 posted on 05/08/2003 8:40:06 AM PDT by Free the USA (Stooge for the Rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; backhoe; Grampa Dave; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Libertarianize the GOP; freefly; 2sheep; ...
ping
9 posted on 05/08/2003 10:10:56 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb; carra; CedarDave; cibco; CIBvet; ClancyJ; CONSERVE; concerned about politics; Coyote; ..
ping
10 posted on 05/08/2003 10:11:27 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks; Goddess50; gc4nra; GrandmaC; G-Rated; Granof8; hammerdown; harpo11; hattend; ...
ping
11 posted on 05/08/2003 10:12:55 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Wow. This is an impressive ping list you have. Please take me off of it. Thanks.
12 posted on 05/08/2003 10:20:09 AM PDT by gcruse (Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the heads up!
13 posted on 05/08/2003 10:25:21 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
wouldn't you be speaking Russian now though?

just kidding, I get your point.
14 posted on 05/08/2003 10:27:56 AM PDT by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative; madfly; Carry_Okie; hellinahandcart; KLT; countrydummy; ...
This stuff really pisses me off. The National Wilderness system already has 192 million acres in it!!!!

That is the areas of 3 Colorados.

Question for the AJC: don't youse guys ever do any homework before you write this drivel?

15 posted on 05/08/2003 10:28:31 AM PDT by sauropod (Occupant of the Land of Peasant Living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative

IT'S ALREADY 192 MILLION ACRES!!!


16 posted on 05/08/2003 10:30:59 AM PDT by sauropod (Occupant of the Land of Peasant Living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Bumping...
17 posted on 05/08/2003 10:31:33 AM PDT by tubebender (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Done.

Sorry. I added your name yesterday to ping to a related Montana thread.

Not trying to show off my list here. Just thought Norton's decision was big news, so I broke up for extra bumps!

18 posted on 05/08/2003 10:34:13 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
I still think that the best thing that the Feds could do is to sell off the 40+% ownership of USA land and pay off the debt. It will never happen but I can dream. If, for example, the federally controlled land on our borders was owned privately in small parcels then we would have a much better understanding of the infiltration of our borders by those who wish us harm. Reopen the Homestead Act in these areas and watch the benefits multiply.
19 posted on 05/08/2003 10:58:14 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
This is easy, every state needs to contain the same % of federal land. No more, no less. If 1% of NY is federal land, Alaska should be the same. If 99% of Alaska is federal, well, to be fair, NY, we are going to have to "take" some stuff, after all, it`s only fair. Oh, by the way, didn`t NY used to have more moose? If they have less, all activity in any place that might be moose habitat has to stop until we can do a study. If we can do that for owls, why not Moose?
20 posted on 05/08/2003 11:21:27 PM PDT by bybybill (first the public employees, next the fish and, finally, the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson