Posted on 05/07/2003 3:57:46 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick
BEHIND THE HEADLINES | |||||||||||||||
Tourism minister angers Sharon by dismissing road map to peace |
|||||||||||||||
By Matthew E. Berger |
|
||||||||||||||
WASHINGTON, May 7 (JTA) Benny Elon may sit in the Israeli Cabinet, but you wouldnt know it from the message he brought to Washington this week. While Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has publicly welcomed the road map toward Israeli-Palestinian peace while making clear his concerns about the plan Elon, the tourism minister, was making the rounds blasting the road map and offering his own, radically different approach. Elon, a leader of the far-right National Union Party, met in Washington this week with some lawmakers, including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), as well as evangelical Christian leaders. A spokesman for Elon said he was on official tourism business, including efforts to get the State Department to downgrade the travel warning currently in place on visits to Israel. But he also has been speaking out against the road map crafted by the United States, European Union, United Nations and Russia. The plan was officially presented last week to Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Elon has been advocating his own peace plan, which would make Jordan which already has a majority Palestinian population into the Palestinian state. Elon was unavailable for comment Wednesday, as he was cutting short his visit to return to Israel. The Elon Peace Initiative calls for dismantling the Palestinian Authority, resettling Palestinian refugees in Jordan, offering economic assistance to Jordan and ending Palestinian terrorism against Israel. His party also has recommended transferring Palestinians from the West Bank to Jordan. Sharon chastised Elon earlier this week, saying it is inappropriate for a member of the government to speak out against government policy while traveling on state business. This causes severe damage to the state, Sharon said, especially when we are talking about a minister who is supposed to be representing the positions of the government. Sharon has publicized its concerns about the road map, but he has tried to work them out with the Bush administration because of Bushs strong support for Israel. Most significantly, Sharon has agreed to meet with the new Palestinian Authority prime minister, Mahmoud Abbas. Some Israeli officials and U.S. Jewish leaders and are concerned that Elons comments could alienate administration officials who back the road map. Elon traveled to Washington repeatedly after becoming tourism minister following the assassination of Rehavam Zeevi in October 2001, until his party left Sharons first government a year later. He returned to the ministry after Sharon formed a new government this spring. Some say Elons goal is to foster an independent support base in the United States. Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.), who met with Elon on Tuesday, said Elon didnt speak about the road map. However, Berkley said she shared her own concerns about the plan. She added that she doesnt consider it problematic for Israeli Cabinet ministers to express viewpoints different from their governments. I dont see the official Israeli government embracing the road map either, she said. Members of the American Congress are smart enough to know what is the official viewpoint of the Israeli government. |
(Excerpt) Read more at jta.org ...
Anyone and everyone with any demonstrable ties to terror would go for sure (unless killed or locked-up). Anyone wishing to remain (and there would be many) should then be compelled to swear a loyalty oath to the Jewish state.
Otherwise, I'm actually in "perfect" accord with Elon.
1) Any so-called palis who remain would likely have to become Israeli citizens and since these people do nothing but shoot out whelps like some defective salad shooter (when they're not strapping on bomb belts and vests), it wouldn't take long for them to become a majority -- and that would mean the end of Israel as we know it, as it would become yet another fetid, Arab terrorist-supporting state.
2) Since the rest of the Middle East is pretty much off-limits to Jews, why should these (alleged) people have the right to set up squatters' rights wherever they please?
As for losing our humanity, I'd rather that than allow them to overrun and destroy Israel. If the squatters get to become Israeli citizens, they will have accomplished a significant goal -- the so-called "right of return." And that is wholly unacceptable.
Also, why no outrage about the fact that there is no Arab country in which Jews are welcome?
Judea and Samaria are Eretz Yisrael. As is Gamla.
Gaza? Hmm. The Philistia of old....
God. The Jews. Israel. Judeo-Christian America.
Choseness.
Humanity.
"Sh'ma Yisrael. Adonai elohenu. Adonai echad!"
Oneness without faith? Reward: land; beyond, unearned?
It grants Israel sovereignty over Judea, Samaria and Gaza.
It recognizes Jordan, not the PA which will be dissolved, as the Palestinian peoples sole representative.
Arabs living peacefully within Israel could remain, however they would be Jordanian, not Israeli, citizens. Subsidies might be available from the international community to relocate in Jordan for those who wished, where presumably the refugees currently in Jordan would be resettled.
The refugees in Syria and Lebanon could be more problematical depending on the cooperation of those countries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.