[jagrmeister]

Having watched the exchange myself, I can say that Neil did not kick O'Reilly's a**. As the host, O'Reilly routinely spoke over Neil and the debate pretty much went nowhere. Neil made a few good points and O'Reilly basically repeated himself. Neil needed to extend his point by saying that because it was a private party, the school and certainly the governor are not responsible. If we want to have the discussion of the wisdom and appropriateness of the kids setting up a whites-only party, then by all means, let's discuss that. But this isn't a question of legality. Neil never made that point, probably because O'Reilly failed to acknowledge Neil's first observation that the party was not a school function.

[TomGuy]

Neil never made that point, probably because O'Reilly failed to acknowledge Neil's first observation that the party was not a school function.

Yes, because that is the whole basis of O'reilly's argument--when he admits it was a private party, his argument are washed out. So he can't admit that the "prom" was a private party.

[faithincowboys]

You're in deep denial, O'Reilly lost his cool more than he ever has. It was a slaughter!

[DensaMensa]

}Having watched the exchange myself, I can say that Neil did not kick O'Reilly's a**. As the host, O'Reilly routinely spoke over Neil and the debate pretty much went nowhere. Neil made a few good points and O'Reilly basically repeated himself.

When the charade was over who looked good and who looked like a horses A$$?