Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
Wouldn't it be more efficient just to burn the natural gas in an internal combustion engine? Or in my furnace and water heater?

77 posted on 05/07/2003 2:51:20 PM PDT by brianl703
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: brianl703
Maybe in your furnace or water heater. But do you really want a tank of flamable gas under preasure in your car? Think of all the accidents you've seen with a big puddle under the back of one car.
78 posted on 05/07/2003 2:53:59 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: brianl703
Wouldn't it be more efficient just to burn the natural gas in an internal combustion engine? Or in my furnace and water heater?

Stop it, you're making sense. These guys have some sort of hydrogen fetish. If we knew that putting one more pound of CO2 into the air would cause some climactic tragedy, then all their hydrogen schemes would make sense. If they want to use less oil, coal,natural gas, or reduce our dependency on foreign sources, then their ideas are stupid.

112 posted on 05/07/2003 9:14:20 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson