Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy
Beware the attacks on hydrogen. Especially the anti-hydrogen articles that rountinely avoid mentioning natural gas, coal, and off-hour hydroelectric surplus as sources.

How much of the coal or natural gas would we have to burn to get the energy to separate the hydrogen?

18 posted on 05/07/2003 12:21:19 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
How much of the coal or natural gas would we have to burn to get the energy to separate the hydrogen?

It's easier to extract hydrogen from oil than from gas and coal. That's why these articles tend not to mention them. Typically the anti-hydrogen articles pick on loopy wind-energy strawmen. Almost uniformly they call people foolish, quote "engineers", and talk about "energy inputs" avoiding the "energy inputs" converting oil into gasoline, and transporting the heavy fuel to markets.

36 posted on 05/07/2003 12:52:04 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Wouldn't it be more efficient just to burn the natural gas in an internal combustion engine? Or in my furnace and water heater?

77 posted on 05/07/2003 2:51:20 PM PDT by brianl703
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson