Skip to comments.
Prez Wannabe Graham Eyeing Evidence That Bush Blew 9/11
newsmax ^
| May 7, 2003
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 05/06/2003 11:20:38 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
05/06/2003 11:20:38 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
If this were true they would have used it before the 2002 election :)
2
posted on
05/06/2003 11:27:38 PM PDT
by
america-rules
(I'm one proud American right now !)
To: TLBSHOW
I have no use for Bush, but I doubt very seriously he could have prevented the 9/11 attacks. There are millions of nuts and subversives in America sending out danger signals. Knowing which one of them are going to act at any moment can be divined by 20/20 hinfsight, but is hard to predice beforehand.
3
posted on
05/06/2003 11:33:35 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: TLBSHOW
How convenient. I've got Bush nailed but i can't tell you anything because its classified. Just give the info to Leaky Leahy, then the truth can be told. Come to think of it. Classification of information never stopped a politician before.
4
posted on
05/06/2003 11:34:45 PM PDT
by
ampat
To: TLBSHOW
My "BS" meter is way pegged on this one. First of all, I agree the Rats would have used it during the 2002 elections. Secondly, if they had such information I'd wage a buzillion dollars they'd find a way of leaking the information. Thirdly, Graham's insinuations are the equivalent of all of these "a high ranking source who wishes to remain unidentified" b.s. quotations in newspapers.
In other words, he's using his position on the committee to portray himself as an expert on these matters and in-the-know. He then "insinuates" things and hides behind the "I'd tell you but I'd have to kill you first" argument. It's despicable.
5
posted on
05/06/2003 11:38:35 PM PDT
by
koba37
To: TLBSHOW
Are you sure it's not info on bill clinton?!
6
posted on
05/06/2003 11:39:17 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: TLBSHOW
This would be tge beginning of the end. Bush would let the dogs out and so would the RATS.
To: ampat
You have the drill down pat.
8
posted on
05/06/2003 11:48:17 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: TLBSHOW
"Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bob Graham is reportedly sitting on damaging evidence that the Bush administration could have prevented the Sept. 11 attacks - but he hasn't released the information yet because it's classified." Just tell it to Patrick Leahy -- that'll do it!
9
posted on
05/06/2003 11:51:22 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Four more years! Four more years!)
To: TLBSHOW
Well Senator Blendered Brain, how about the official facts of the JFK assasination first? "Nyeh, nyeh, nyeh". What a jerk.
To: ampat
I said after you,
"Just tell it to Patrick Leahy -- that'll do it!" Read posts first...read posts first...(hitting self in forehead).
11
posted on
05/06/2003 11:53:41 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Four more years! Four more years!)
To: TLBSHOW
HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAA! Bring it on, Graham!
Bachelor and Alexander: The Debka of talk radio.
12
posted on
05/06/2003 11:54:38 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: scott7278
It bears repeating!
13
posted on
05/06/2003 11:54:57 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Timesink
14
posted on
05/06/2003 11:57:55 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: MEG33
Yeah, but I feel really stupid when I do that. It's like joining a conversation and telling a joke or story that was just told.
15
posted on
05/06/2003 11:59:38 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Four more years! Four more years!)
To: scott7278
LOL.
16
posted on
05/07/2003 12:01:11 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: america-rules
It wasn't an election like 2004.......
The Secrets of September 11
The White House is battling to keep a report on the terror attacks secret. Does the 2004 election have anything to do with it?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/907379.asp?0cl=c1 The problem as always is not to hide stuff but get it out in the open first. That has always been the best way, instead if these reports are true it is only going to make matters worst. Even John LeBoutillier is hinting at a something in his latest story.
(scandal long simmering begins to unravel?)
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/5/213637.shtml What I see will happen is rumor after rumor will get started. Best thing to do is to get out front and stop the problem now. Not later when the storm is full blown.
Just my 2 cents on this matter.
17
posted on
05/07/2003 12:17:45 AM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: TLBSHOW
Of course our intelligence agencies missed obvious warning signs--they are good enough that they would pick those signs up, even if they didn't realize their full importance. It's obvious the ball was dropped at some point. And if Al Gore had managed to steal the presidency, we would be harping on this day and night. We would be posting that "if Gore hadn't stolen the election, 9/11 wouldn't have happened."
Bush and his underlings did f--- up, majorly, somewhere. Bush didn't take the threat of Islamist terrorism seriously enough to force change in the culture of the FBI (which practically just let this whole thing happen).
But does this mean Graham would have done, and will do, any better in the future? Of course not.
18
posted on
05/07/2003 12:23:46 AM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: xm177e2
Then he should come out and say it and not try and hide it, and it will go away. If he does not the rats use it against him. The press is already working overtime on this and it makes The President look like he is hiding something. Get it done and over with now. As we see Graham will use it against him and this whole thing fits with the Bush Knew BS right after 911 that they started to use. Now if he is really saying we won't release this to the public it will sure as heck look like a cover up is going on.
19
posted on
05/07/2003 12:37:41 AM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: TLBSHOW
How could there have been so much information that should have been available to the Bush adminisitration that would not have been available to the Clinton administration?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson