To: The_Reader_David
I asked first.
170 posted on
05/06/2003 9:45:46 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
If sufficient power was produced the reactor would have lost moderation and reflection, resulting in a shutdown. Until shortlived fission product poisons decayed away, even immediate re-saturation may not have resulted in restarting the nuclear chain reactions. Therefore, the reactor probably did not operate continuously, but at discrete intervals with the operating time determined by the power output, water supply pressure and temperature, and water flow through the reactor. The duration of the shutdown periods would have been determined by the buildup of fissionproduct poisons and the length of time required to replace the moderator (if it boiled away) or to cool it sufficiently to resume the reaction.
175 posted on
05/06/2003 9:54:28 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: Doctor Stochastic
Following Christ's example when he replied to the Pharisees with the question about the baptism of John: then neither will I tell you whether I believe a nuclear reactor can arise by chance.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson