Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doctor Stochastic
If sufficient power was produced the reactor would have lost moderation and reflection, resulting in a shutdown. Until shortlived fission product poisons decayed away, even immediate re-saturation may not have resulted in restarting the nuclear chain reactions. Therefore, the reactor probably did not operate continuously, but at discrete intervals with the operating time determined by the power output, water supply pressure and temperature, and water flow through the reactor. The duration of the shutdown periods would have been determined by the buildup of fissionproduct poisons and the length of time required to replace the moderator (if it boiled away) or to cool it sufficiently to resume the reaction.
175 posted on 05/06/2003 9:54:28 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
The question was whether a nuclear reactor could form by chance. Whether the (hypothetical) reactor is/was intermittent is interesting, but not what I asked.
181 posted on 05/06/2003 10:00:16 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson