Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RON PAUL: "So Much for Social Conservatism in Congress"
Ron Paul's Website ^ | 5-5-03 | Ron Paul

Posted on 05/05/2003 12:12:59 PM PDT by oursacredhonor

Just six short months ago the Republican party won a stunning victory in the 2002 election, increasing its majority in the House of Representatives and retaking the Senate. With Republicans controlling both Congress and the White House for the first time in fifty years, many assumed legislators would push a socially and fiscally conservative agenda.

Yet nothing could be further from the truth, as an embarrassing vote last week clearly demonstrated. The supposedly conservative Congress overwhelmingly passed a foreign aid bill that could have come straight from the desk of the most liberal Democrat. The legislation sends $15 billion of your tax dollars to Africa, ostensibly to fight AIDS by distributing condoms, providing sex education, and funding abortion providers. Needless to say the bill gives money to some very questionable organizations and programs, and will undoubtedly pad the bank accounts of some of the worst governments in the world.

House leadership, often characterized in the mainstream press as far-right wing, actively promoted and praised the bill. A Republican press release after the vote gushed that “This bill is a moral crusade… to save a continent from the Great Plague of our age.” So much for the socially conservative agenda of the GOP!

Opposition to the bill was minimal, although 40 Republicans did cast principled votes against it. Other conservatives who were slightly uncomfortable with the vote satisfied themselves by passing an amendment that requires some of the $15 billion to be spent on abstinence programs. Yet does anyone honestly think we can control how our dollars are spent once they reach Africa? Obviously money is fungible anyway, so “earmarking” funds for pet conservative programs does nothing. Furthermore, Republican leaders completely ignored efforts in committee to forbid funding for abortion in the bill.

As a physician I am of course concerned about terrible diseases like AIDS, and have great sympathy for those who suffer from AIDS both here in America and around the world. But the question is not whether each and every one of us wants to eradicate AIDS. The question is whether yet another government program, especially one that sends money overseas, is a constitutionally proper or effective way to combat the problem. We certainly should have learned by now that good intentions alone can never justify a wasteful and ineffectual government program.

The United States has sent billions and billions of dollars overseas for decades to do fine-sounding things like “building democracy,” “fighting drugs,” and “ending poverty.” Yet decades later we are told that in every category these problems have actually gotten worse. Most of the money has disappeared into the bank accounts of dictators, or into salaries for well-paid consultants who administer our foreign aid; very little has changed in the impoverished nations themselves. Yet we refuse to learn from these mistakes, and now Congress has made another multi-billion dollar mistake with the AIDS bill.

As Thomas Jefferson famously said, “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Last week’s vote underscores the need to end the sinful and tyrannical practice of forcing Americans to pay for programs or organizations they believe to be immoral, such as those that distribute condoms and perform abortions.

Sadly, this $15 billion expenditure comes even as Congress is cutting funding for veterans by roughly the same amount. The Treasury is running record deficits, the Pentagon is engaged in enormously expensive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and veterans’ programs are badly underfunded- yet still Congress is sending billions overseas for yet another dubious and unconstitutional program. This should anger every American who still believes in the true conservative tenets of limited government, fiscal restraint, and private charity instead of social welfare programs


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: ronpaul; ronpaullist; socialconservatism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 781-791 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2003 12:12:59 PM PDT by oursacredhonor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AAABEST; Uncle Bill; Victoria Delsoul; Fiddlstix; fporretto; Free Vulcan; Liberty Teeth; Loopy; ...
-
2 posted on 05/05/2003 12:17:32 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: oursacredhonor
Ba Ba ba But they are our Liberals!
4 posted on 05/05/2003 12:18:40 PM PDT by Lysander (My army can kill your army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
Social Conservatism is dead everywhere...not killed politically but done in by the brainwashing the institutional left has foisted on the past 1.5 generations.

They cleaned our clock. This forum is at times evidence enough of that.
5 posted on 05/05/2003 12:21:50 PM PDT by wardaddy (I know you rider, gonna miss me when I'm gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
Davey Crockett of our times, bump.
6 posted on 05/05/2003 12:23:59 PM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Whitey
Oh how I long for him to run for President

I thought he already did that as a Libertarian.

7 posted on 05/05/2003 12:26:40 PM PDT by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Thank you Ron.
The only bright side of this is that the cash won't be spent on vote buying schemes in America. It's being wasted elsewhere.
8 posted on 05/05/2003 12:31:08 PM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
The one upside of this spending is that the Dems can't say we are ignoring the plight of the Aids victims in Africa.
9 posted on 05/05/2003 12:31:27 PM PDT by Chirodoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Whitey
He did, as a Libertarian in 1988.

http://www.lp.org/organization/history/p1988.html
10 posted on 05/05/2003 12:33:27 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
This is indeed an outrage. Now how do we get all the folks that think so to tell their representatives at simultaneous times? That is the key. A loud shout out at one precise time is bound to be heard and more effective than a few writing in helter skelter. That method is easier for the Pols to dismiss.

It is time for acountability. The internet has allowed information to be shared by the masses in an instant. Now we need to have concerted, instantaneous responses that require answers. I wish I knew how to host something like that.

11 posted on 05/05/2003 12:33:37 PM PDT by Kudsman (LETS GET IT ON!!! The price of freedom is vigilance. Tyranny is free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Whitey
Oh how I long for him to run for President.

I thought he did.

12 posted on 05/05/2003 12:34:34 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
The word "billion" tends to obscure how much money we're talking about. Think of it like each million dollars represents four, $250,000 houses. Then think of $15 billion as 60,000, $250,000 houses. That's the equivalent of building a small city's worth of $250,000 houses and you and I are paying for it.
13 posted on 05/05/2003 12:37:45 PM PDT by agitator (Ok, mic check...line one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
Thank you, great post. I'm glad to hear some 40 congressmen voted against this unconstitutional, foreign aid giveaway. Another $15B of hard-earned American money being confiscated from those who earned it and flushed down the international toilet. Where were the other approximate 200 GOP members, most of whom, I'm sure, tell us at election time they're "conservative"?
14 posted on 05/05/2003 12:40:56 PM PDT by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
The legislation sends $15 billion of your tax dollars to Africa, ostensibly to fight AIDS by distributing condoms, providing sex education, and funding abortion providers. Needless to say the bill gives money to some very questionable organizations and programs, and will undoubtedly pad the bank accounts of some of the worst governments in the world.

Its ok ...as they were fiscally responsible by cutting services and medical care to Disabled Veterans....

Welcome Home Troops....we wave flags then screw veterans.... Life Member DAV (Disabled American Veterans) Life Member MOPH (Military Order of the Purple Heart)

15 posted on 05/05/2003 12:42:27 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
"They cleaned our clock."

So the fact that the 'Thong-Clad Texas Cyclist' gets more replies than 'Constitution-Clad Texas Republican means that America is lost to Decline?

Not really. We're only human; that's all. ;^)
16 posted on 05/05/2003 12:43:24 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oursacredhonor
AIDS IN AFRICA

What a boondoggle.

17 posted on 05/05/2003 12:46:45 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Whitey
Oh how I long for him to run for President.

When Paul ran on the Republican ticket, the Republican party funded the Democratic opponent rather than support him.

Says alot, huh.

18 posted on 05/05/2003 12:47:52 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lysander
Basically, we're down to Democrat Liberals, and Republican Liberals. Two minutely different forms of Big Government.
19 posted on 05/05/2003 12:50:05 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chirodoc
The one upside of this spending is that the Dems can't say we are ignoring the plight of the Aids victims in Africa.

No, now they can whine we are taking their agenda away from them.

Ain't a dime's worth of difference.

20 posted on 05/05/2003 12:50:37 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 781-791 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson