Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Revives Clintons' Vince Foster Scandal
NewsMax.com ^
| Monday, May 5, 2003
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 05/05/2003 11:42:30 AM PDT by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: muggs
ping
41
posted on
05/06/2003 7:48:12 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: ChemistCat
"He was also the clinton's bag man who carried their drug money to Swiss banks."
yitbos
To: muggs
ping
43
posted on
05/09/2003 12:55:01 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: bruinbirdman
BUMP TO THE TOP!
44
posted on
05/09/2003 12:56:26 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: JeanS
There have been millions of words written on this subject but the bottom line is:
This was a Hillary ordered hit and a Hillary ordered coverup.
Anyone who has looked into her eyes knows she is quite capable of ordering cold blooded murder and quite prepared to murder others to cover her trail.
What they should wrtte on Vince's tombstone is "He had _very_ bad taste in women." ;-)
45
posted on
05/09/2003 1:02:09 PM PDT
by
cgbg
To: timestax
ping
46
posted on
05/10/2003 12:29:59 AM PDT
by
timestax
To: timestax
ping
47
posted on
05/10/2003 7:00:44 AM PDT
by
timestax
To: muggs
ping
48
posted on
05/10/2003 2:14:54 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: timestax
ping
49
posted on
05/10/2003 3:27:11 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: Mister Baredog
"The real question(to me) is how anybody could think anything "positive" about the Clintoons?"
Political strategists at the RNC love the clintons more than the NRA loves Feinsweine and Schumerscum. The mere mention of either bring donations and votes. Showing their pictures evokes emotional reactions of fear and deep seated hatred.
The clinton finger wag picture is worth millions.
50
posted on
05/10/2003 3:50:51 PM PDT
by
SSN558
(Be on the lookout for Black White-Supremists)
To: SSN558
The clintonclintoon finger wag picture is worth millions.LOL!
51
posted on
05/11/2003 7:11:54 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: JeanS
bump
52
posted on
05/19/2003 5:16:03 PM PDT
by
nocuous
To: muggs
ping
53
posted on
05/20/2003 9:57:07 AM PDT
by
timestax
To: E. Pluribus Unum
bumping for the truth!
54
posted on
05/20/2003 9:58:06 AM PDT
by
timestax
To: muggs
ping
55
posted on
05/20/2003 10:14:29 AM PDT
by
timestax
To: timestax
ping
56
posted on
05/21/2003 9:17:19 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: JeanS
I heard Allan J. Favish on a radio show over the weekend. He was fantastic. He intends to get to the bottom of this, and knows in his heart and by the evidence that Foster did not kill himself. Anyone who reads any of the stories on the subject cannot believe he did. Hoping with him that the Supreme court ends the coverup, but who knows?
To: smith288
I think you are right. Bush cannot appear to undermine Clinton, but it sure looks like a lot of drip, drip, drip!
To: sit-rep
At times, I think the only difference between the two partys is the spelling.Oh my!
To: ladyinred
Let's see, yesterday's news cycle had Sid Blumenthal floating Hillary 2004 trial balloons and today's news cycle has something on the Foster case. Coincidence? Could be. Or maybe not.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson