Skip to comments.
Why Do Conservatives So Quickly Abandon Their Own?
Cathryn Crawford
Posted on 05/04/2003 8:57:27 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford
Isn't it true that a lot of the bashing of Bill Bennett is simply due to the fact that conservatives naturally rejoice in the misfortunes of their own? The ability of the conservative movement to abandon their own people when they are even slightly attacked by the liberal/media establishment is absolutely astounding.
Why are conservatives so quick to judge their own? Are we afraid? Are we so afraid of being tainted by a scandal that we will so easily turn away at the first sight of blood?
This is a serious and long-term issue among conservatives that deserves to be adressed.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: billbennett; conservatism; gambling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 401-410 next last
Comment #341 Removed by Moderator
To: Cathryn Crawford
How is gambling bad?
A matter of perspective, judgement, moderation. Do you think we'd be taken aback (and that's what we are...nobody's got their pitchforks and torches out for Bennett) if we were talking about the guys getting together for poker, cigars, spitting, scratching, and swearing?
Millions of dollars in losses (if that's what it is) is surely lacking in moderation, and brings with it the taint of the swaggering Hollywood high-rollers who pay wads of cash for a brief thrill. Throwing that kind of money away is simply a contempt for hard work. Unseemly. Indiscreet. Tacky, tacky, tacky. "Waste not, want not."
Such glitter and excess is not the image that conservatives choose to ally themselves with. But he's hardly being lynched, you know, to have to listen to the annoyance and disapproval of his fellow conservatives. Bennett's a big boy.
I did not appreciate Jonah Goldberg's apologia--and I'm fond of Goldberg. Perhaps the elites ought to be aware of how they come across to us, the "rank and file" conservative, and take a few pains not to offend. Goldberg runs with the elites, perhaps, more than he's aware.
Bennett is a pundit. His fortune comes with a public.
To: Cathryn Crawford
The hellish thing about what you just said is...shh, don't tell anyone...what he did was okay! There was nothing wrong with it! People CHOSE to make a big deal about it. It's just crap.Well, the extent to which HE was talking about it (or conversely, attempting to conceal it) might be relevant to the issue of whether this activity was a problem for him. I don't know to what extent he was talking or writing about this "hobby" of his.
Generally, though, I tend to agree with your major premise that recreational gambling is usually no one else's business.
To: Cathryn Crawford
The money isn't relative because gambling is a vice that unless treated as a profession and done methodically, you will lose.When you stay in a losing game, you are irrational, and to blow $8mil is VERY stupid.He had no concept of the risk he was taking, and you bet smaller when you get on a losing streak, and yet the slots have a brutal %, and did he adjust his bets accordingly? Nope, he kept on sailing.
Plus, you aren't his financial advisor, lawyer or accountant, so how can you be in a postion to say he could afford to lose that amount? Do you know the state of his marriage, or his homelife and what toll his addiction has taken on those aspects of his life?You want to believe him, but me, all I see is a guy that pissed away a lot of money doing something very stupid,over and over and over, and that is a red flag waving which makes me doubt his judgment on any number of things.
Comment #345 Removed by Moderator
To: habs4ever
To an amateur, it could be soSure can. I'm sure both of us know people who have sat in front of computer terminals playing OEX futures, etc. in a fashion that can only be described as gambling. LOL
But certainly you're right that most investing/trading is readily distinguishable from video poker.
To: habs4ever
By reading your post, it sounds like you know the guy personally and he's poured out his inner thoughts to you. How do you know the lies he tells himself? How do you know his urge is uncontrollable, are you a family friend.
No where does it say he lost 8 million, it says he bought the chips, he said he broke even. I can't agree he's automatically an addict because he did something you would do differently.
347
posted on
05/05/2003 5:27:26 PM PDT
by
fml
To: fml
An addict doesn't change his bet size or take the money off the table.Did he leave it on account with the casino to use as collateral for a binge? To stay up until dawn, pulling the slots, isn't the sign of a healthy gambler, chum.
To: Mamzelle; ValenB4
So, do you think my opinions are elitist?
(Martin, this one's for you!)
349
posted on
05/05/2003 5:55:31 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Winning isn't everything, but losing is nothing.)
To: habs4ever
How do you know he had no concept of what he's doing? The questions you ask me apply to your opinions, too.
350
posted on
05/05/2003 5:57:07 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Winning isn't everything, but losing is nothing.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
Conservatives are more intellectually honest...but overreact a lot to keep from being tainted by the stain of scandal.
......
And this is one more nothing issue as the Trent Lott issue was.
351
posted on
05/05/2003 5:58:35 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: Cathryn Crawford
I agree, a conservative will cut off his nose to spite his face. This is why the demoRATS get away with the double standard that they enjoy. It's time to force the RATS to put up or shutup.
To: Scenic Sounds
Thank you...did you enjoy the MW ping?
353
posted on
05/05/2003 5:59:40 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Winning isn't everything, but losing is nothing.)
To: TLBSHOW
I know it, and you know it, but do they know it?
354
posted on
05/05/2003 6:00:18 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Winning isn't everything, but losing is nothing.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
I think to an extent, conservatives have integrity and are basically unwilling to defend the undefendable.
As far as Bennett goes, its not much of an issue.
To: Cathryn Crawford
Sure did, thanks.
And you keep up the good work!!
To: Scenic Sounds
Gracias, amigo...keep agreeing with me! :-) LOL
357
posted on
05/05/2003 6:02:09 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Winning isn't everything, but losing is nothing.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
I know it, and you know it, but do they know it?
Good evening Cathryn and the answer is no they don't.
358
posted on
05/05/2003 6:02:12 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: TLBSHOW
Good evening, Todd, and I think a lot of times...you're right!
359
posted on
05/05/2003 6:02:40 PM PDT
by
Cathryn Crawford
(Winning isn't everything, but losing is nothing.)
To: HitmanNY
Big deal Bennet gambles, it's not like he coaches a baseball team and is betting against his own team.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 401-410 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson