N Korea announces it has 100 missiles pointed at USA

ABC ^ | 5-4-03 | ABC

[geros]

Un propagandista del Régimen de Pyongyang afirmó hoy domingo que Corea del Norte posee al menos 100 misiles nucleares apuntando hacia a Estados Unidos, que serían utilizados si al país asiático le son impuestas sanciones económicas. El director ejecutivo del centro para la paz coreana-estadounidense, Kim Myong Chol, declaró al canal de televisión australiana ´Channel Nine´ que está "claro" que Corea del Norte posee "por lo menos 100 ojivas nucleares y 300 como máximo". "Todas están dirigidas hacia ciudades estadounidenses", agregó.

Como "portavoz oficial de Corea del Norte" Kim aceptó realizar esta entrevista para la televisión australiana desde un país extranjero, sin conocerse donde se llevó a cabo. El "portavoz" aseguró que la tecnología nuclear utilizada para producir las ojivas fue probada en Pakistán y que las armas se fabricaron antes de que el Gobierno de Pyongyang firmara el acuerdo de no proliferación nuclear.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

This guy is looking for some new logos to decorate the side of his plane!

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

I thought of that too.

Hey, North Korea - I have my pencil pointed at you, and I'm not afraid to throw it!

[Destro]

Um, Bob was only bluffing...

[snooker]

Actually we have only one pointed at N. Korea. The difference is ours is real.

[CyberAnt]

Hmmmm? According to our intel (and some people here on FR), that's not possible.

But ... Since I'm on the left coast - and nearest - I guess I better get my emergency kit ready! You know ... just in case.

[Steve Eisenberg]

Kim Myong Chol, who styles himself executive director of the Centre for Korea-American Peace

Maybe they can sign up Jimmy Carter as honorary chairman.

[risk]

Sure, China could likely overwhelm what we've announced that we're developing. But would they?

Good point. Even if our new missile shield were to only stop 10% of their incoming, it would still be a factor they'd have to consider. If they lose 10% as duds, that would reduce the overall effectiveness of their attack to 80%. And since we have lots of subs out there armed to the teeth, you get the picture. Of course a missile shield might be even more effective than 10% -- much more.

[Stultis]

[Grampa Dave]

Courtesy of Fixit

[TankerKC]

lovely

[Recovering_Democrat]

But we don't need a missile defense program. <\sarcasm>

[rontorr]

"Is it me, or does it seem like North Korea WANTS us to attack them'

Have you ever read the mouse that roared?

[slasher82]

Really!!!!! Why not use Foreign Aid(only take from countries that we suspect hate us anyway and/or still owe us) and U.N. money(only after we exit and take OUR money with us) to spend on Defense????????? Does anyone know how much we spend annually on F.A and the U.N.????? (I THINK I would like to know).............

[geedee]

Stick 'em up!

[AndrewC]

Actually, the North Koreans have already hit the United States with a missle, and our government has turned a blind eye to it.

This is at the bottom of that article.

Printer-edition | |

1>	ID : sanjoek	03/13/2003 11:20
"Elvis found at South Pole"

[sharktrager]

They said they were pointed at US cities.

They never said they could actually reach them.

[Eala]

Remember our wolves still patrol the depths of the oceans ready to turn NK into a sheet of glass. One NK launch at USA = NO NK.

Not a good solution. Both Koreas want reunification, with families split across the border. One needs to take out the North's leadership and neutralize its army.

[Farnham]

"We'll see your 100 missiles, and raise you total absolute devastation of your country for a thousand generations - the only thing left alive will be the cockroaches."

Yes, but they will be HUGE,MAN EATING cockroaches, which will swim the Pacific and attack Hollywood.(Hey!, a twofer)

[oldironsides]

Never mind the hair, look at his stubby arms.

[gedeon3]

How many do they think we have pointing at them?