Log Cabin Republicans... Infiltrators with a mission

World Net Daily ^ | 5/2/03 | WND

[Paloma_55]

The leader of a Republican homosexual activist group that considers itself a moderate influence in the party is linked to radical "queers" urging the murder of Christian leaders, according to a family advocacy group....

[E Rocc]

I've never seen any data on it, but I'd reckon that a very, very minute percentage of homos believe in God and/or the Bible.

This is a requirement for being a Republican now?

-Eric

[longtermmemmory]

This thread goes with the recent Homo trolls we have been getting. I would not be surprised if some of the ID's here are aged or hacked ID's of dormant accounts. FR has attracted the attention of university "activists" of the left.

[Consort]

You may be right. The Admin Moderator will find them out over time.

[E Rocc]

Well, many of us, (straight Republicans), would point out that there is no such wording in the U.S. Constitution that denotes any separation of Church & State.

In addition, this only applies to the federal government. States are free to designate a state religion if they choose,

Most state constitutions forbid them from doing anything so anti-American, and the Fourteenth Amendment also imposes the restrictions of the Bill of Rights onto all levels of government.

-Eric

[Lancey Howard]

I don't think that people who promote man-boy "love", kindergarden "fisting" classes, and teenage barnyard sex should be allowed any standing in the Republican Party. These kinds of things represent Democrat Party values, and that's where these people should stay. Just my 2 cents.

[Byron_the_Aussie]

...this is why the homos are in the Republican Party. To sabotage it, and ultimately disable it from stopping their agenda. We should kick their sorry asses out...

Some homosexuals, perhaps. Those who put a militant gay agenda, before their 'conservatism.' But to kick out someone on the basis of their being gay alone would not only be contemptible prejudice, but also a loss for our side. Alan Jones, a fiercely conservative talk show host here in Australia, is enormously influential. And gay. I can't imagine where we'd be without him.

[jla]

This is a requirement for being a Republican now?

Don't believe I ever said it was...although it certainly doesn't hurt.

Here, this one's for you:

[Misterioso]

Ooooh! Can I have one?

[E Rocc]

Is there a reason you are posting that on a thread about gay Republicans? >:)

-Eric

[GrandMoM]

....go here for one example of a GAY radical in the LCR!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/904046/posts

[GrandMoM]

BTTT

[jla]

Is there a reason you are posting that on a thread about gay Republicans?

Yes, I seen that you're a Brown's fan & decided to go off-topic with a little levity.

[Munson]

Then the Casey family and other conservative Democrats like former Congressman Phelps needs to start a movement to bring back faith and family back to the Democratic Party. It will be just as difficult as the "big tent" republicans quest to broaden the party.

[maxwell]

I feel it is necessary to give my support to gay Republicans.

Well one has to ask oneself, is it worth that 3% of the vote to sell one's soul...

I have no delusions about the GOP being pure as the driven snow. I am also not under the delusion that every single homosexual is a pink-feather-boa-toting flamer out on the street corners in fishnet hose trying to seduce little boys every weekend. I am also libertarian enough to believe that it's none of the govt's durn business what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own domicile, and folks should do whatever floats their boat as long as they don't bother me or cost me money.

That being said: how can an honorable Republican justify an alliance with those vocal members of a group whose whole shtick derives from something as base and animal as what appendage goes in whose orifice?

Think about it-- defining yourself first and foremost by your sexuality. The gods meant higher things for us than that.

I am an American first, a scientist second, and unsolicited questions about my sexual orientation will be met with pugilism.

[Chancellor Palpatine]

What do we need 3% of the population for, when they have proven that they are immoral, they are perverted, they will lie, cheat and deceive to obtain their objectives.

Pretty good description of the paleocons.

[Ferret Fawcet]

I am a Bible-believing Christian first, and a Conservative Republican second. I came to the GOP because they strongly support conservative values and family. If our party's goal of "inclusion" means condoning sin, then I want no part of it. I see it this way- what does it profit a man to gain a few votes but loose his soul? I don't claim to be without sin, none of us are. However, I believe that so many of our society's problems stem from NOT discouraging sin. I do not advocate gay-bashing in any form, but neither do I think we should be supporting the Gay & Lesbian agenda.

[Paloma_55]

I am not suggesting that we should kick out homosexuals. I would say "get rid of the liberals from the party". Most of the Log Cabin Republicans are liberal. They organize on the fact that they like anal sex.

If someone is a Republican, supports Republican values, recognizes that the Republican Party is based upon conservatism (social and economic) and they are willing to play within that paradigm, fine.

I have met so freakin many LCRs who are LIBERAL, but claim to be moderates. Their thought is that if they support government funded abortion, gay marriage, etc... but they want tax cuts, that makes them moderate. No. It makes them libertarian.. which is essentially liberal on social issues.

[Paloma_55]

First off, when I mentioned 3%, that is total number of homosexuals. When you look at the LCR, they represent a fraction of a percent of the Republican party at best.

Second, they are DESTRUCTIVE to the party. They oppose basic platform elements.

Third, the fact that they reject social norms and morality has demonstrated to me over the years that they will lie, cheat, and do whatever they think helps meet their objective. In this case, undermining of the Republican Party.

Why do these people organize upon the fact that they are queers?

What if there was an "Adultering Republicans" group? Should we endorse them? Gather them in? I hate to say it, but such a group would likely have more numbers than the LCR. I would say that anyone who wanted to organize on the fact they are adulterers should also be banned.

[Tribune7]

I am glad you are in the Republican Party but if you are truely in the conservative movement you will support Sen. Santorum's position that consensual sex between adults is not a Constiutional right.

[narses]

"how can you prevent me or anyone from entering into a contract with another sentient adult? "

Contracts for sex are against public policy. Marriage exists, in part, to deal with issues such as children and what happens on the death of their parents. Same sex perversions are incapable of creating life, therefore they have no need for those governmental protections.