[Ferret Fawcet]

I am a Bible-believing Christian first, and a Conservative Republican second. I came to the GOP because they strongly support conservative values and family. If our party's goal of "inclusion" means condoning sin, then I want no part of it. I see it this way- what does it profit a man to gain a few votes but loose his soul? I don't claim to be without sin, none of us are. However, I believe that so many of our society's problems stem from NOT discouraging sin. I do not advocate gay-bashing in any form, but neither do I think we should be supporting the Gay & Lesbian agenda.

[E Rocc]

If our party's goal of "inclusion" means condoning sin, then I want no part of it.

The point is there is a significant difference between condoning "sin" and banning it by law. While any consistent libertarian or conservative would oppose the LCRs if they are agitating for special rights, the views of some that private and personal matters are indeed government's business makes it clear that they have legitimate reasons to organize and lobby.

-Eric