Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

These stars are acting in a manner that does not correspond to the Nuclear Fusion model of stellar development... instead the observed events ARE consistent with, and have been predicted by, the Electrical Star theory. Hmmmm.
1 posted on 05/03/2003 12:33:42 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
Maybe it ate another star. One that was directly behind it from our perspective which could not be seen.
2 posted on 05/03/2003 12:43:53 AM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; boris; Davea; Sabertooth; plusone; vannrox
Ping
3 posted on 05/03/2003 12:48:33 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Electrical Star theory.?????

Google turned this up for me:

Electrical Discharge Theory
Charles Bruce (1902 - 1979)

5 posted on 05/03/2003 12:52:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
See this thread also:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/904988/posts?page=2
6 posted on 05/03/2003 12:53:52 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker; RadioAstronomer
Interesting stuff!
8 posted on 05/03/2003 1:36:53 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Any time an electric charge moves from point A to point B, we have an electrical current.

Said current is measured in amperes or parts thereof.

Voltage is the pressure that makes it move.

Imagine a rotating galaxy. Imagine that its net charge is either positive or negative. (that can easily be approximated by spectral analysis and the valences of its constituent atoms.)

I can easily predict electrical currents that can only be described by 3+ figure exponents.

9 posted on 05/03/2003 2:29:29 AM PDT by mfulstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Sirius is a main sequence, brilliant white A-type star. The ancients (among them: Cicero, Horace, Ptolemy, and Seneca) called it red or "coppery" in color. Seneca, in the days of Nero, called it "redder than Mars", whereas he described Jupiter as "not at all red."

This is because Sirius is a binary star. Its companion, whimsically called "The Pup", is a white dwarf star of apparent magnitude 8.5. It is nearly lost in Sirius' glare.

Below is a Chandra x ray image of Sirius and the Pup.

Back in ancient times, the white dwarf may have still been a red giant (This still seems to be a very short timeline, of course).

The red giant spilled material that Sirius captured and added to its bulk. Now Sirius is a bright white "A" type star.

Excerpt from Burnham's Celestial Handbook, Volume One:

In ancient times, the color of Sirius was often referred to as red, reddish, or ruddy, and the star was sometimes calley Bloody, and referred to as Blazing like fire. (Although blazing may have simply been a reference to its brightness). Was Sirius red in ancient times? Did its color change over the last several thousand years? This is yet another mystery associated with the brightest of stars, Sirius. In The Iliad, Homer referres to Sirius gleaming like Achilles' copper shield. Earlier, the Babylonians referred to Sirius as Kak-si-di, which meant "shining like copper." Granted both writings were done during the bronze age, when copper was the commonly used metal, and so would have perhaps been a common metaphor for something shiny or brilliant. However, both the Greek writer Aratus, and the Roman poet and writer Cicero referred to Sirius' color as "ruddy." Seneca, Nero's tutor, stated that Sirius was "redder than Mars" and compared it to Jupiter which he states is not at all red, (Mars is quite reddish, while Jupiter has a distinct yellowish tint to the naked eye.) Another clue is the fact that in the days of ancient Rome, "ruddy dogs" were sacrificed to the "Dog Star", Sirius; (ruddy dogs, and dog star seem to indicate some connection with color). Even more telling is a statement by Ptolemy, one of the greatest natural scientists and geographers of Roman history, who compares Sirius with Betelgeuse and Antares, two indisputably red colored stars, (and red giants), as all being fiery red.

Today, we know Sirius as a type A1 main sequence star with a surface temperature of about 10,000 K and a luminosity of about 23 times our Sun. Our Sun on the other hand, has a surface temperature of about 6000 K, and is a typical yellow main sequence star. Sirius is a brilliant white to very slightly bluish. It seems highly unlikely that Sirius could have undergone enough stellar evolution in 2000 years to increase its color. Also such a color shift (from red to yellow to white to blue) would indicate an increase in temperature and gas contraction over this time, rather than a decrease in temperature and expansion of gas which would be the customary evolutionary route.

In 1862, it was discovered that Sirius was actually a double star, the larger, brighter counterpart being Sirius A, and the smaller dimmer companion being Sirius B, interestingly a white dwarf star. The two stars are seperated by only about 11 arc seconds at maximum seperation (the orbital period is just under 50 years). Fainter Sirius B has a magnitude of only about 8.7 while Sirius A has a relative magnitude of nearly -1.5. It has been suggested that the color shift of Sirius, as indicated by the ancients above, could have been the result of the eveloution of Sirius B, which may have gone from a much brighter red giant to a white dwarf. This is a typical chain of events in stellar evolution, but such a change is unlikely over so short a time. (It is thought, that the process would take at least 10 to 20 times longer than the indicated 2000 or so years.) Lastly, Sirius B is the nearest and brightest white dwarf that we know of, only about 8.7 light years distant. Such a "flare out," if it occurred would certainly have been observed from Earth, and would also have been bright enough to have significantly effected the overall brightness and color of Sirius.

12 posted on 05/03/2003 6:01:55 AM PDT by petuniasevan (Wonders of the Universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
It's obviously a photon torpedo fired at us by Klingon or Romulan terrorists.
13 posted on 05/03/2003 6:07:31 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Marker
39 posted on 05/03/2003 4:34:47 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
bump
46 posted on 05/03/2003 7:47:35 PM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Seen conventionally, the nova eruption can mark the death of a star; to Bruce it was a discharge of great extent but with no fatal consequence for the star.

This is baffling. Is he claiming neutron stars and black holes don't exist? And how are his "lightning bolts" generated?

49 posted on 05/03/2003 8:38:05 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
FG Sagittae has changed from blue to yellow since 1955!

As I understand it, standard astronomical theories do not allow for that, pure and simple. Something's wrong with the observation or with the theories, one way or another.

52 posted on 05/03/2003 8:58:39 PM PDT by merak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
I don't don't care where they run, as long as its not at us traveling 50 billion miles per hour!!
55 posted on 05/03/2003 9:06:27 PM PDT by Lockbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Just now got around to looking at the picture of the thing which Scott is talking about; good grief!:


62 posted on 05/08/2003 4:28:02 PM PDT by merak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Alternate theory .... someone's building a Dyson shell.

64 posted on 05/09/2003 8:37:23 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson