Yes, you should continue. At least to the point where you actually start making an argument which connects your random observations. So far you seem to think that just naming countries constitutes some sort of inescapable conclusion.
There is a clear and present correlation.
Between... What? How is this alleged correlation demonstrated?
To continue to deny the facts before oneself is to remove ones credibility as an honest broker of truth.
What "facts" would those be? "Europe" may be a place, but what sort of unspecified "fact" about it do you believe supports your vague point?
I refuse to continue to comment on this subject. Come on guys, give me a break.