[Dimensio]

My grandfather's words: "Hmmm, I am hungry, I think I will grow a mouth. Hmmm, I need someplace to store the food, I will grow a stomach. Gotta get rid of the excess food, let's grow an a$$. Now how xcess food, let's grow an a$$. Now how much sense does that make boy?"

Well, if evolution were anything like the strawman that you presented then you might have thorougly ridiculed it. Since evolution doesn't work that way, however, your comments are meaningless.

The funny thing about this...ID does not reference God, Jehovah, Jesus, or anything of the sort. It simply uses science to show that their had to be some sort of, well, intelligent design to everything. But this absolutely infuriates evolutionists! I love it.

Actually, it does not infuriate me. I'm bothered by the lack of real scientific method applied in "ID theory" and the question-begging that it presents. However, it has been shown in may instances that proponents of ID theory, such as those pushing to have it taught in some public schools, are actually trying to dress up Biblical creationism (this coming from their own statements where they betray their true intentions).

If you have a repeatable, testable and observable method to demonstrate that life is the result of intelligent intervention, then I'd like to see it. Present it for peer review, win a Nobel Prize.

[Dataman]

Well, if evolution were anything like the strawman that you presented

I see it's time to start the ubiquitous strawman labeling.

[rwfromkansas]

I have only met one evolutionist who actually was willing to listen instead of simply call us "idiots" or "people that do not really believe science."

Forgive me for thinking you are all arrogant pricks that consider yourselves superior.