Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Attorney Says Defense Is 'Strong'Kirk McAllister Is Protecting Key Witnesses
NBC11 ^ | May 1, 2003 | Karen Brown

Posted on 05/02/2003 5:48:38 AM PDT by runningbear

Former Attorney Says Defense Is 'Strong'
Kirk McAllister Is Protecting Key Witnesses


Attorney McAllister

Former Attorney Says Defense Is 'Strong'
Kirk McAllister Is Protecting Key Witnesses

Karen Brown

POSTED: 10:25 p.m. PDT May 1, 2003
UPDATED: 10:58 p.m. PDT May 1, 2003

MODESTO, Calif. -- Scott Peterson's former attorney says he has some powerful evidence that will help defend Peterson against charges that he murdered his wife, Laci, and his unborn son.

Scott Peterson's original attorney, Kirk McAllister (pictured left) said his office has uncovered evidence that will exonerate Peterson -- evidence that will be turned over to his new attorney. Defense sources say the new attorney will be Mark Garagos, NBC11's Karen Brown reported.

To send condolences Laci Case(my insert)

Condolences:
1508 Coffee Road
Suite H
Modesto, CA 95355

McAllister told NBC11 that the defense's case is "strong."

When asked why, he said, "because we investigated it instead of calling press conferences like the police did."

The key to Peterson's defense will be the testimony of witnesses uncovered by McAllister, witnesses he says need to be protected, Brown reported.

"I'm protecting witnesses, because I have concerns for them if I go public," he said.

According to defense sources, Los Angeles attorney Mark Garagos -- who has represented high-profile clients like Winona Ryder -- will take over the case Friday morning.

The current public defender says getting Garagos will only strengthen Peterson's defense.

"I think he's going to do a great job," said Kent Faulkner, the deputy public defender. "He's got the resources. He's got the knowledge. He's got the connections. I think it'll change the landscape of the way the case is tried."

Meanwhile, the District Attorney's office issued a statement saying, "We treat all cases as the case needs to be treated. Who the defense attorney is, is not going to change what we do."

In the meantime, Laci Peterson's family is busy preparing for the memorial that will take place Sunday at the First Baptist Church in Modesto.

Scott Peterson has not made an official request to attend that memorial, but the sheriff here says if that request is made, he'll deny it, Brown reported. Sign-up For Breaking News E-mail Alerts Copyright 2003 by NBC11.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast,

Public defender says he believes Geragos will assist Peterson

EXCERPTED:

Public defender says he believes Geragos will assist Peterson

By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER

Published: May 2, 2003, 05:11:14 AM PDT

Stanislaus County Public Defender Tim Bazar said he expects Los Angeles attorney Mark Geragos to step in today to defend Scott Peterson, who is charged with murdering his wife and unborn son.

"I do anticipate that he is going to come in on the case,"

Bazar said Thursday afternoon. "But I've got to hear it from the judge."

Peterson, 30, is charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner.

Superior Court Judge Nancy Ashley appointed the public defender to the case last week. A hearing scheduled for 8:30 a.m. today before Judge Al Girolami is designated for substitution of counsel.

If Geragos steps in, the public defender's office would turn over the case completely

Bazar said.

"It's just not appropriate for a county agency to take a secondary role," Bazar said. "We wouldn't be in a position to actually control the course of the case."

Bazar said his office has canceled one contract extended to a potential expert, and ceased efforts to retain other experts and investigators.

"I don't think it'd be prudent to spend county money on a case where it appears we would be off the case in a matter of hours," Bazar said.

Geragos said Wednesday on the CNN program "Larry King Live" that he would make a decision on the case Thursday. But Geragos did not return calls Thursday.

In Modesto on Tuesday, Geragos met with Peterson and representatives of the public defender's office.

LA lawyer expected to take case


Laci Peterson

LA lawyer expected to take case

By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER

Published: May 2, 2003, 05:11:44 AM PDT

About 3,000 people are ex-pected to attend a Sunday afternoon memorial service for Laci Peterson, the Modesto woman whose remains were found last month along the eastern shore of San Francisco Bay.

That turnout would be more than double the estimated 1,200 people who nearly a year ago paid their respects to Chandra Levy, a Modesto woman whose disappearance, like Peterson's, gripped the nation.

The 24-year-old Levy was the subject of a major search and intense media coverage after she disappeared in 2001 in Washington, D.C., where she had just completed a federal internship. Her remains were found almost 13 months later in a District of Columbia park.

The body of Peterson's unborn son, Conner, washed ashore about a mile from his mother's body. Scott Peterson, 30, has pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder in the slayings of his wife and son. He faces the death penalty.

The memorial service is set to take place on what would have been Laci Peterson's 28th birthday.

"The family wanted it to be on her birthday," spokeswoman Kim Petersen said.

Family and friends are slated to speak at the memorial service, which will include a video tribute, choir performance and other music.

"There will be songs that were some of Laci's favorites and ones that had a lot of meaning to the family," Petersen said.

The memorial service is set to start at 3 p.m. at First Baptist Church, and is expected to last an hour.

Streets near the large church generally are closed for Sunday services, but there will be more closures this week, and they will be longer, police said.

The city will have 17 officers on duty around the church Sunday, Lt. Gary Watts said. Four will be working overtime, and another four will be reserves.

The extra police were required because several scheduled officers already are assigned to other events on the Cinco de Mayo weekend, he said. The city will absorb the approximately $1,200 extra cost, Watts said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbc11.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidanceof; avoidingalimony; avoidingchildsupport; capitalpunishment; childsupport; conner; deathpenaltytime; getarope; guilty; killerhusbands; laci; lacipeterson; peterson; sonkiller; sweetgirl; sweetwife; whatasweetgirl; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-354 last
To: runningbear
I seem to have been dropped from your ping list, as I never got this thread.

The only way I know it exists as I was looking to see where a certain poster was.

Will you please put me back on?

341 posted on 05/03/2003 5:02:45 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
One of the things I took a while to learn, in criminal cases, was that just because a defendant has a squeaky-clean prior record (no convictions for anything), doesn't mean that that defendant should necessarily testify.

Some people may be as innocent as the driven snow of the crime charged, but for some reason they just can't tell a straight, coherent story on the witness stand. They end up looking like they are hiding something; sometimes they come off as too eager to explain themselves, or they may be focusing too much on subject matter which is not legally relevant to their case. Such people should not take the witness stand; even having the jury secretly wonder about them is better than watching them tell some convoluted story up there.
342 posted on 05/03/2003 6:34:18 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
In my opinion, the point here IS terminology. I already knew that the defense gets surrebuttal. But they only get it if the plaintiff/prosecution puts on rebuttal. Never does the defense get rebuttal.
343 posted on 05/03/2003 6:36:36 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: clouda
Gag, gag, gag. Sorry, all those fair people out there. I'm not even thinking at the moment of his possibly being a murderer. I'm thinking, look at this guy, look how he acted, knowing that he was already committed to someone else. And that he had a son on the way.
344 posted on 05/03/2003 6:40:37 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: clouda
Great. So now potential jurors out there are going to be thinking that Scott must prove his innocence? When, in fact, his burden is not that large? What kind of nut IS Geragos, to say such a thing?
345 posted on 05/03/2003 6:43:43 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
I did ping ya... You must of fell off in the pinging cyberspace..... hummm, just can't figure why some do or some didn't .... Let me know.. Did you get the one today?
346 posted on 05/03/2003 6:56:00 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
"Did you get the one today?"

If this is the one you are talking about, "Calif. Family Renews Search for Boy" yes I received it.

I don't know what happened on the other one. Thanks for all your work in keeping us informed.

347 posted on 05/03/2003 7:20:44 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
I just pinged ya on the other one...
348 posted on 05/03/2003 7:33:47 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: uvular
On Rita Cosby's show tonight, the same question you ask was posed on Rita's show. They were talking a million or more dollars, but Jeffrey Feigler (Kervorkian's atty) didn't believe it. He believes Geragos is pro bono or no more than one dollar. He explained that Scaught couldn't afford an atty and had to have public defenders without any word from his family about hiring an atty, leaving the impression that the money was not there for a private atty. And Geragos is a high-priced lawyer.

Then, all of a sudden, Geragos shows up as Scaught's atty hired by the family. This led Jeffrey F. to believe the case is pro bono. He went on to say that we'll be able to tell if it is pro bono. Experts, testing, autopsies, and everything else that goes along with a capital offense trial like this cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Unlikely to have all of this with a pro bono case.

To make matters worse IMO, according to another atty, Geragos will need an assistant experienced in capital offense trials since he may not have that experience. That will cost another bundle. I guess we'll have to wait and see. Do you know if this trial will be on Court TV? I'd love to hear Nancy Grace report that one!

BTW, Jeffrey said the Amber Frey evidence alone will convict SP...there was enough there, a lot...plus all the other evidence the LE have. But the Amber evidence would do him in.

349 posted on 05/03/2003 9:43:00 PM PDT by EastCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I heard another atty say that he didn't think Geragos had capital offense trial experience. Said that these trials were different from all other trials and the atty should have capital offense trial experience because the life of his client is in jeopardy. (MSNBC)
350 posted on 05/03/2003 9:52:36 PM PDT by EastCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
I seem to have been dropped from your ping list, as I never got this thread.

LOL!! This isn't the first time this has happened. Hey RB! You got a "leak" in your ping thingy!! :o)

BTW, are you going to the memorial tomorrow?

351 posted on 05/03/2003 10:03:47 PM PDT by alexandria ( T.A.K.E. {{"The All Knowing Entity."}})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: EastCoast
I don't remember Geragos having any high profile murder cases he handled; he missed having to do much more than p.r. for Condit. Interesting point about having to 'hire' yet another attorney. Almost sounds like Scott would have been better off with the court appointed attornies! I doubt at this point Geragos can entice any other attorney to jump on board (other than that one female atty. that's on Greta's show alot).

I bet even if Court TV can't cover the trial on tv, Nancy Grace will be sitting in that courtroom!

352 posted on 05/04/2003 6:24:56 AM PDT by uvular (It's Spring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
"BTW, are you going to the memorial tomorrow?"

A little far for me to go, since I live in Washington State now.

Ooops! after re-reading I see you were probably asking RB.

353 posted on 05/04/2003 9:36:22 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Spunky; runningbear
"BTW, are you going to the memorial tomorrow?"

Opps! Sorry about that. Yes, I had thought I was asking RB about it. Note to self: always check the chainof information flow before posting!

354 posted on 05/04/2003 1:22:11 PM PDT by alexandria ( T.A.K.E. {{"The All Knowing Entity."}})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-354 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson