Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hope I didn't overstep any protocol. I'm sure most know this, but I received interest in this little trick.

If it looks too confusing, just look at "THE TRICK" part of my stuff!

1 posted on 04/30/2003 6:15:29 PM PDT by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: bannie
WHO = SUBJECTIVE
WHOM = OBJECTIVE

Subject = the "doer." Object = the "do-ee."

So, let me get this straight.

When referring to Monica Lewinski we should use "WHO" and when referring to Bill Clinton we should use "WHOM"?

42 posted on 04/30/2003 7:01:12 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Recently I have noticed some very good writers using "who" where "whom" should be according to the usual rules. Just yesterday Christopher Hitchens wrote something like (can't find the link) "he saw the fellow who he gave the money to" rather than "he saw the fellow to whom he gave the money."

Lots of people would like to see "whom" go the way of the dinosaurs, I think, and recently it seems editors are looking for ways to restrict usage of the word.

50 posted on 04/30/2003 7:05:33 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
A quick quiz:

"There are a lot" or "There is a lot"?

The Wall Street Journal editor seems to think the former (yesterday's WSJ.) And so, to be consistent, should we be saying "there is many"? Heck, I can do as well (as good?) Can I have a glamourous editor job too also?

55 posted on 04/30/2003 7:10:49 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Know any tricks for hence, thence, and whence?
79 posted on 04/30/2003 7:26:50 PM PDT by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
The little tongue twisted we used to chant as a reference was:

Who holds whom for whom?
For whom does who hold what?


81 posted on 04/30/2003 7:27:48 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
How does this affect bunnies?
87 posted on 04/30/2003 7:32:59 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie

"Whom luvs ya, baby?!"

88 posted on 04/30/2003 7:33:43 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
The Whom:


93 posted on 04/30/2003 7:37:07 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Them:


98 posted on 04/30/2003 7:40:44 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie

Whom do you love?
100 posted on 04/30/2003 7:41:38 PM PDT by openotherend (I'm their leader! Which way did they go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Who-la (whom-la?):


105 posted on 04/30/2003 7:44:55 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Thank you very much for giving us the benefit of learning your trick. I deeply appreciate knowing it and will enjoy passing it on to the home schooled crowd.

108 posted on 04/30/2003 7:49:19 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Who affects the Who's effects?
127 posted on 04/30/2003 8:03:03 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand
ping
128 posted on 04/30/2003 8:03:08 PM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
To whom was this post intended?

Heh heh heh....

144 posted on 04/30/2003 8:18:15 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
The Whooters:


148 posted on 04/30/2003 8:21:45 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
My kids say "This kid said..." I say, "this guy or that guy?" They don't like this business. We also go at it with "He went..." "He went where? To the store? To the bathroom?"

Eminem blew it for my with "...between you and I, females lie."
I don't disagree with the sentiment, but his grammar fails.

This thread is classic FR.
151 posted on 04/30/2003 8:27:13 PM PDT by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
OK, here's another one that makes me crazy, and lots of a lot of many educated folks do it - using an apostrophe in the possesive form of "it".

it is = it's
belonging to it = its

I believe it's the only possesive form that doesn't use an apostophe.

153 posted on 04/30/2003 8:30:47 PM PDT by T Minus Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Any tricks with pronouns, I,me, he, she, him, her.
155 posted on 04/30/2003 8:32:43 PM PDT by Coleus (RU-486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bannie
Well done, and I hope that everyone who reads it remembers and uses it! (Now, to get people not to write "loose" when they mean "lose"...)
158 posted on 04/30/2003 8:35:14 PM PDT by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson