Posted on 04/30/2003 6:46:34 AM PDT by Paul Ross
Reprinted from NewsMax.com
Pentagon Joins French Boycott
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, April 30, 2003
No U.S. Military Jets at Paris Air Show
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is reported to be unhappy with France at the moment. Rumsfeld's displeasure with Paris is about to be put on display – or, to be more accurate, not on display.
The Pentagon has decided to cancel all flying demonstrations of U.S. military aircraft and limit the numbers of top uniformed officials attending the 2003 Paris air show. The move is one of many planned actions to be taken in the near future to limit military contacts with Paris.
The decision to limit appearances of aircraft and uniformed brass at Paris is not going over well inside the U.S. defense industry. Some top-level officers who expect to retire to industry jobs are openly grumbling that Rumsfeld's decision will hurt the U.S. defense industry.
The main fear is that France will win military export contracts because it will have a monopoly on flight demonstrations at the Paris air show.
However, senior defense officials feel that the recent performance of U.S. airpower over Iraq serves as a clear demonstration of why American aircraft are sought out by the majority of buyers around the world. For example, Poland just closed a deal with the U.S. to purchase 48 F-16 Falcon jet fighters in a deal reported to be worth over $3.5 billion.
"One can't help notice that the Russians and French are very good at making ejector seats," quipped one defense official.
French Missiles in Iraq
The Pentagon restrictions came after U.S. Army and Australian special forces teams discovered advanced versions of a French-made surface-to-air missile system in Iraq. U.S. Air Force officials are certain that Iraqi French-made Roland missiles downed at least one A-10 "Warthog" attack jet and may have killed two USAF pilots in an F-15E Strike Eagle.
Australian special forces teams working in Iraq’s western desert uncovered 51 Iraqi MiG fighters hidden near an abandoned airfield. The Aussie soldiers also discovered a cache of Roland 2 missiles and a launcher near the hidden MiG jets.
The Australian special forces members were critical to the success in the Iraqi western desert against possible missile attack against Israel.
In addition, U.S. airborne troops from the 101st division recently stumbled onto a French-made Roland 3 missile system, complete with radar, computer and fire control electronics. The French army first deployed the Roland 3 advanced missile in 1995. The Roland 3 unit supplied to Iraq would be a clear violation of the U.N. arms embargo placed on Iraq after the first Gulf War.
French defense ministry officials recently denied that the Roland 3 was supplied to Iraq. However, French defense industry insiders speculated that Iraq might have acquired the Roland 3 unit illegally from "mafia" sources, suggesting that Paris has a problem with black market theft inside advanced military projects.
Euro-Military Alliance
The strain in U.S.-Franco relations is also showing at a mini-defense summit in Brussels between France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg. The move is seen as an attempt by Paris to form a new Euro-military alliance to replace NATO.
Belgian officials nervously denied that the meeting is an attempt to form a separate defense structure, hoping not to inflame already troubled relations with America. Brussels-based defense officials noted that the four nations have pledged to increase their defense spending by 0.45 percent.
"The object is to evaluate where we stand and what we need to do to meet our objectives," stated a top Belgian defense official.
Relations between Paris and Washington were strained even prior to the Iraq war. U.S. intelligence officials frequently noted that France actively conducts economic and military espionage in the United States. According to counter-intelligence estimates, only Russia and China have larger spy networks inside the U.S.
French Weapons in China
France has also come under fire for supplying advanced arms to other potential U.S. adversaries such as China. In fact, the Chinese navy currently employs a version of the French Tavitac, a modified version of the U.S. NTDS (Naval Tactical Data Systems) Link 11. The Link W system employed by China is an unlicensed copy of the U.S. Link 11 supplied to the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) by France.
France also has supplied surface-to-air missiles and anti-aircraft radars to China. A recent Pentagon report to Congress on Chinese military modernization concluded that France is assisting the PLAN in building advanced submarines.
"A new version of the Song-class conventional submarine is expected to incorporate advanced Air Independent Propulsion. This report details other Song innovations: a skewed seven-blade propeller, submerged antiship cruise missile launch capability, and flank array sonars of French design," noted the U.S. military report.
"One can't help notice that the Russians and French are very good at making ejector seats," quipped one defense official.
Bwah hah hah hah hah.
The decision to limit appearances of aircraft and uniformed brass at Paris is not going over well inside the U.S. defense industry. Some top-level officers who expect to retire to industry jobs are openly grumbling that Rumsfeld's decision will hurt the U.S. defense industry.
There's a word for people who put their pocketbook before their country...Actually, there a lot of them. All very foul, and would get my behind banned if I posted them
"The Chinese navy currently employs a version of the French Tavitac, a modified version of the U.S. NTDS (Naval Tactical Data Systems) Link 11. The Link W system employed by China is an unlicensed copy of the U.S. Link 11 supplied to the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) by France.
We really need to slam them for their commercial and military misappropriation of sensitive licensed designs.
On the other hand, as I recall, we the US people are loaning the Poles the $3.5B to buy these planes. Plus part of the deal was to build factories in Poland to make parts for the planes. Past experience demonstrates that once the loan comes due it will be "rolled over" or at least partially written off. So I guess it is better than no deal at all, but it is definately not as good as it would be if they were paying for it out of their pockets instead of we US citizens paying for it out of our pockets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.