Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

April 29, 2003 Big Brother's new classroom
The Washington Times ^ | April 29, 2003 | Arnold Beichman

Posted on 04/29/2003 8:01:35 PM PDT by jrushing

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:02:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
"The guidelines ensure conformity of language and thought."

How can we return our schools to our control? There should be a wall of separation between Education & State!

1 posted on 04/29/2003 8:01:35 PM PDT by jrushing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jrushing
Homeschooling BuMp.
2 posted on 04/29/2003 8:05:48 PM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrushing; kayak
Interesting. Do you think the schools were ever in control of the "masses"? There has always been a kowtowing to education ~~ however, there was a time when teachers towed the mark!

Kay - this is probably part of what you heard about today.
3 posted on 04/29/2003 8:07:15 PM PDT by jtill (Those who love the Lord never meet for the last time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
education reform bump
4 posted on 04/29/2003 8:09:28 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
A little help on formatting...
The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com

Big Brother's new classroom

Arnold Beichman
Hoover Institution Published April 29, 2003

     
     THE LANGUAGE POLICE: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn.
     By Diane Ravitch.
     Knopf. 243 pages. $24.
     
     In her introduction titled "Forbidden Topics, Forbidden Words," Diane Ravitch, the nationally renowned educator and historian, describes how she "stumbled upon an elaborate, well-established protocol of beneficent censorship, quietly endorsed and broadly implemented by test publishers, textbook publishers, states and the federal government." What she next writes should send a shiver down the backs of parents with school children:
     "What I did not realize was that educational materials are now governed by an intricate set of rules to screen out language and topics that might be considered controversial or offensive. Some of this censorship is trivial, some is ludicrous, and some is breathtaking in its power to dumb down what children learn in school."
     The villains in this dumbing down process go by an innocent, virtuous title: "bias and sensitivity review" panel. These panels are tainted by a spreading and threatening disease, PCS, or Politically Correct Syndrome. Panel members — the language police — are routinely hired by publishers and state education agencies to screen every test and textbook for potential "bias." These panels, pressured by lobbies of left and right have, writes Ms. Ravitch, "evolved into an elaborate and widely accepted code of censorship . . . hidden from public sight." The author has collected examples of what some of these bias reviewers have recommended for elimination from school tests.
     A short biography of Gutzon Borglum, who designed the Mount Rushmore monument consisting of gigantic heads of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. Why shouldn't school children read about this acclaimed national monument? Because the Lakota Indians, said the panel, consider the Black Hills a sacred place to pray and consider the sculpture "an abomination." Out.
     A passage about owls was eliminated from a proposed test because a panel member said that owls are taboo for the Navajos. Out.
     California has informed publishers not to include references in their textbooks to "unhealthy" foods such as: french fries, coffee, bacon, butter, ketchup and mayonnaise among others. California, along with Texas, have the largest school populations, so when their book-buying panels command, the four major textbook publishing houses stand at attention.
     Such prohibitions are promulgated by these powerful "bias and sensitivity review" panels not on the basis of any kind of research findings but "because the topics upset some adults, who assume that they will upset the children in the same way," writes Ms. Ravitch. "The guidelines ensure conformity of language and thought."
     Four different agencies promulgate the bias guidelines, which have become a preemptive form of censorship: educational publishers, test development companies, scholarly and professional associations and the states themselves.
     Some of these guidelines are simply mad. One commands textbook authors to acknowledge — this will come as news to American historians — that the United States was "patterned partially after the League of Five Nations, a union formed by five Iroquois nations." Literary classics by William Shakespeare, Herman Melville, Mark Twain, John Steinbeck and others are bowdlerized to a degree I never dreamed possible. The ultimate goal of the academic curriculum, says one publisher's set of guidelines, is "to advance multiculturalism."
     The most stunning section of the book includes the 1993 guidelines prepared by McGraw Hill, one of the four conglomerate textbook publishers in the country. The basic thrust of the guidelines, says Ms. Ravitch, is not to depict the world "as it is and as it was, but only as the guideline writers would like it to be." She writes: "The bias guidelines are censorship guidelines. Nothing more, nothing less. This language censorship and thought control should be repugnant to those who care about freedom of expression."
     What the textbook and testing industry have accepted without demur or public discussion is that the object of education is to produce a generation of high school graduates who accept "diversity," which, of course, makes quotas inevitable and racial discrimination admirable. The real world is replaced by a politically correct fairy tale in which it is morally acceptable to "censor" "Romeo and Juliet" or "Macbeth" so as to ensure that the ninth-grade dears don't inhale wicked ideas. What does it matter if the classics are chopped and their authors betrayed?
     Indignation misplaced? Well then, go to the book's 32-page appendix, "A Glossary of Banned Words, Usages, Stereotypes and Topics." There you'll see the meaning of the cultural revolution incited by the "bias and sensitivity panels." Perhaps that appendix ought to be attached to George Orwell's "1984."
     


5 posted on 04/29/2003 8:18:57 PM PDT by kritikos (Truly true truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
Whoops! Which is what I NEED...
6 posted on 04/29/2003 8:19:50 PM PDT by kritikos (Truly true truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
And these textbooks go into the hands of teachers and instructors who increasingly come from cookie-cutter schools and campuses and join and pay dues to unions that form integral parts of one of the major political parties of this country. A political party that places great store in marching goose step to a drum beat of political correctness.
7 posted on 04/29/2003 8:21:09 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kritikos
.Whoops! Which is what I NEED... Once again...
8 posted on 04/29/2003 8:23:55 PM PDT by kritikos (Truly true truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
Well then, go to the book's 32-page appendix, "A Glossary of Banned Words, Usages, Stereotypes and Topics."

We'll take time here to note that posting the appendix on the Net would, of course, be a "copyright violation". Ain't American "law" grand? ;-)

9 posted on 04/29/2003 8:28:16 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
This is simply outrageous!

Thank God homeschooling offers an alternate view.

Oh, and the <P> is our friend. IMHO, the simplest way to post from the Wash Times is to scroll all the way to the bottom of the article, click "Print This" and then cut and paste the printer friendly version.

The Wash Times indents to indicate paragraphs. The HTML parser in your browser converts multiple spaces (indentation) to one space, which is why your article looks so run together. Just paste <p> in the indentation spaces and the article will be much more readable.

10 posted on 04/29/2003 8:30:20 PM PDT by upchuck (Contribute to Republicans for Al Sharpton for President in 2004. Dial 1-800-ELECT-AL :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtill; Miss Marple; Brad's Gramma; homeschool mama; nicollo
Yes, jtill, this does sound like it is the basis for the report I heard on FOX News today. Thanks for the ping.
11 posted on 04/29/2003 8:30:28 PM PDT by kayak (Pray for President Bush, our troops, and our nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kayak
Forewarned *bump*!

Kay, I've been working on a project to ressurect lost words. The idea is to scan old, copyright-free material and make it available in bound paperback on-demand. The internet purists have tried to make this real via e-text, but it is my feeling that digital ain't paper, and paper is best.

If we can make it happen, we will revive old text books and manuals and make them available to any and all who reject modern censorship. It might just work.
12 posted on 04/29/2003 8:54:57 PM PDT by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
"The ultimate goal of the academic curriculum, says one publisher's set of guidelines, is "to advance multiculturalism."
13 posted on 04/29/2003 9:02:25 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicollo
Sounds like a wonderful idea ...... but what about all the school children who are being indoctrinated? As long as school systems are using these new textbooks there is a problem .... until parents decide to take back the schools. That day is still quite a way off, I fear.
14 posted on 04/29/2003 9:14:46 PM PDT by kayak (Pray for President Bush, our troops, and our nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kayak
There are moments in history when ideas collide, and thoughts trend from one side to the other. The most dangerous moment for any ideology is when it is at its height. At that moment it is most tested, most vulnerable. It may win out, or it may be beaten for a time. But if it is true and real, it will win. If it is wrong, it will dies.

A few examples in our brief history are (and not limited to):

- The American Rev0lution. It was spawned by the arrogance of the English Crown.

- Andrew Jackson's common man. Previous to him, land owners ruled. Jackson represented the sovereignty of the common man. Alexis de Tocqueville documented the Jacksonian revolution.

- Abraham Lincoln's Second American Revolution. Slavery was never stronger than when Lincoln took office.

- Wm. McKinley's suppression of populism. The great Ohioan re-affirmed Washington, Hamilton, Jackson, and Lincoln. Taking down Wm. Jennings Bryan, McKinley defeated populism at its height.

- Wm. Howard Taft and his defeat of the progressive wing of the Republican party. Taft ended once and for all notions of "direct democracy," by which the "people" would decide all affairs, including judicial and constitutional arguments. Taft's victory came over Theodore Roosevelt whose Bull Moose, the greatest third party electoral assault ever, marked the height of the progressive movement.

- Dwight Eisenhower, who killed off FDR leftism. The Left died to WWII, but it took Ike to make sure it was gone.

- Ronald Reagan who came into office just when the elite had decided that the Soviet model was supreme.

- George W. Bush, who salvaged America from Clintonian relativism. Dubya has taught the world that we are right. God bless him!
15 posted on 04/29/2003 9:33:34 PM PDT by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nicollo
Yep people collide, like when the indians sided with the brits in the american revolution forfiting thier land by an act of congress...
16 posted on 04/29/2003 10:06:02 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (Not all indians were bad though, but some were real mean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
Not all indians were bad though, but some were real mean.

Hannah Dustin *bump*

(She stopped a movement at the height of its powers)

17 posted on 04/29/2003 10:09:07 PM PDT by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
Let's all do our school prayer...

B-B. B-B. B-B. B-B. B-B. B-B. B-B. B-B. B-B. B-B.

Ahhhhh, that's better! (/sarcasm)

18 posted on 04/30/2003 12:51:10 AM PDT by Mr. Morals (Long live a free Iraqi people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrushing
The really sad thing is at least 99% of graduating teachers of History, do not realize that a change in the textbooks has even taken place. The experienced teachers should be pitching a fit, but they are so beleaguered by all of the crap coming down from the state and federal governments that they either do not notice or do not have the time or energy to do anythng. Not to mention, that this sort of thing has been going on for at least 30 years, leaving precious few teachers that have even been exposed to the true history.
19 posted on 04/30/2003 2:54:35 AM PDT by David Isaac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; All
The new face of home schooling - More and more, African-American families redefine 'homeroom'
20 posted on 04/30/2003 4:11:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson