Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Enraged as Cuba Returned to U.N. Rights Body
Reuters ^ | 4/29/03

Posted on 04/29/2003 12:31:16 PM PDT by areafiftyone

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Cuba was reelected without opposition on Tuesday to the United Nations' top human rights body, prompting a fierce response by Washington that it was "like putting Al Capone in charge of bank security."

The voting took place in the 54-nation U.N. Economic and Social Council, which two years ago ousted the United States from the Human Rights Commission for the first time since Washington helped found it in 1947. The United States was returned to the body in a vote the following year.

In Washington, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told reporters: "Cuba does not deserve a seat on the Human Rights Commission. Cuba deserves to be investigated by the Human Rights Commission."

In the last month, the Cuban authorities have rounded up 75 dissidents and imprisoned them for terms of up to 28 years. As part of the crackdown, Cuba also executed three men who hijacked a ferry in a failed bid to reach the United States.

"Having Cuba serve again on the Human Rights Commission is like putting Al Capone in charge of bank security," Fleischer said. "It is an inappropriate action that does not serve the cause of human rights in Cuba or at the United Nations."

Cuba's U.N. ambassador, Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla, accused the United States of executing minors and the mentally retarded people and abusing the rights of Afghan fighters long confined without charges in a U.S. base on Cuban territory.

Britain, whose soldiers last month invaded Iraq alongside U.S. forces, also won reelection to the Geneva-based 53-nation rights commission, easily fending off a challenge from states which opposed the war and defeating Portugal.

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATORS

Human rights groups said this year's elections carried on a trend of increasing domination of the commission by noted human rights violators, many of whom, like Cuba, were proposed on a regional slate without opposition.

"You have a huge powerful and very well organized bloc that doesn't want any country criticized, opposes U.N. human rights monitoring and wants to weaken the office of the U.N. high commissioner for human rights," Joanna Weschler of Human Rights Watch told Reuters.

"It's almost a rule now. You get criticized by the commission or you might be, so you get a seat on the commission and you vote as a bloc against criticism," Weschler said.

Among other members with rights records that have come under fire are Democratic Republic of Congo, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Zimbabwe.

Countries are nominated for three-year seats on the commission through their U.N. regional groupings. most of this year's candidates were unopposed within their group.

Seats were contested only within the Asian group and the "Western Europe and Others" group, which includes the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Sichan Siv. U.S. ambassador to the Economic and Social Council, briefly walked out of the session following Cuba's uncontested reelection, because, he said, Havana was "the worst violator of human rights in this hemisphere."

Winning a three-year term on the commission were Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Mauritania, Bhutan, Indonesia, Nepal, Qatar, Hungary, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Italy and Netherlands.

Reelected to new three-year terms were Britain, Costa Rica, Cuba, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, India, Peru, Russia, Saudi Arabia and South Africa.


TOPICS: Cuba; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cuba; humanrights; un; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Truth29
The voting took place in the 54-nation U.N. Economic and Social Council, which two years ago ousted the United States from the Human Rights Commission for the first time since Washington helped found it in 1947. The United States was returned to the body in a vote the following year.

Not sure !

21 posted on 04/29/2003 12:53:33 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Tell me again why we are in with this brood of vipers.
22 posted on 04/29/2003 1:10:36 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
UN out of the US now

Will never happen. The UN is the best thing the Democrats have to beat over W's head. Can you imagine the squealing that will occur about "unilateralism," the endless interviews of Madam Albright, the speeches from Senator Asmodeus (aka Hitlery) if this gets proposed by the Republicans?

23 posted on 04/29/2003 1:22:41 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

UNecessary!

24 posted on 04/29/2003 1:22:45 PM PDT by Seeking the truth (I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
US out of the UN now!

UN out of the US now!

Exactly! Do you think we're ever going to get a clue and actually make this exact thing happen?

Where's the JDAMs when you need one?

25 posted on 04/29/2003 2:28:44 PM PDT by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
From what I can figure out, each country is nominated within a certain regional "group," then the entire slate (not each individual country or group) is approved. If a nomination is uncontested within a group, it's a foregone conclusion that country will sit on the Human Rights Commission. In other words, if you win the primary (within a regional group), you win the election.
26 posted on 04/29/2003 3:01:14 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
U.S. Enraged as Cuba Returned to U.N. Rights Body

Just what the other countries were aiming for. The U.N. Human Rights Body is a joke.

27 posted on 04/29/2003 3:11:59 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: browardchad
Thanks for the clear explanation.
29 posted on 04/29/2003 3:27:25 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
If Saddam Hussein is found alive, can he be made the head of the U.N. Rights Body?
30 posted on 04/29/2003 3:55:12 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone


31 posted on 04/30/2003 1:44:37 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson