Replies

You have your own personal ideas on what "evolution" is that simply doesn't jibe with reality.

Like what. Be specific. I think we are all very tired of your baseless accusations (and insults and know-it-allisms). Please present MY personal idea of evolution that does not jibe with reality. HINT: you better back it up with supporting evidence (like quotes) – you know-it-all types are always trying to pretend you can read minds. (BTW: exactly HOW MUCH of evolution do you think falls into the category of “reality” – again, please be specific unless you are nothing more that a disrupter)

You've been deconstructed 400 times by now and some of us (not me, I admit) have patiently tried to spell it out for you that we are talking biology here.

400 times – can you provide evidence for this accusation – or is it just more intellectually dishonesty – man, you are on a roll.

Once again you are wrong – I was responding to a thread about the origin of the universe (cosmology) and what should be taught in schools (THAT was the topic of the thread, not biological evolution per se – and I bet you don’t grasp the meaning of per se). BTW: I provided supporting evidence for this position many times but that does not stop you from repeating your disproved statement like a parrot. BTW: that was ANOTHER thread but that did not stop your from reintroducing your disproved statement IS THIS THREAD. CLUE: I was not the one that brought up cosmology in this thread.

that you would shut up with your inane "evolution as cosmology" patter.

Are you one of the close-minded know-it-all clowns that is still trying to claim evolution has nothing to do with cosmology. You can lead a know-it-all to data, but you can’t make them think.

And ALS, you've been asked dozens of times on this thread to present to us your groundbreaking ideas that will cut the legs from current evolutionary theory.

The problem is you know-it-all Orthodox Darwinists apply rules to other people’s statements/theories that your own positions/theories can not meet – that is intellectual dishonesty

I promised myself over and over to ignore you. But, like a splinter under a toenail, I simply can't.

Please present MY personal idea of evolution that does not jibe with reality. HINT: you better back it up with supporting evidence (like quotes)

All of the following are from this infamous thread, italics are your statements: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/909701/posts

"Orthodox Darwinists believe that Darwinist Evolution is complete and scientifically proves the origin of the universe. Most Orthodox Darwinists believe evolution as a cosmological theory can be proven by science."

Huh? "Orthodox Darwinists?" "Evolution as a cosmological theory?" When you use your own terms which mean what you want them to mean to support your own line of thinking, the real world will always fail to grasp it. You're the only one speaking your language here.

"Tell us what you think the starting point of evolution as cosmology is - where did that matter come from? What caused the big bang?"

I think "evolution as cosmology" means nothing to anyone but you. Evolution as we know it, is usually meant to be biologic, and does not, will not, and can not address the big bang. You should really know this by now.

"People that believe Darwinism explains it all related to the origin of the universe – people that believe evolution as cosmology is scientifically provable."

Again, huh?

"Nothing related to the origin of the universe and Darwinism has “turned out to be true” they are all still theories

Umm, ok. Wait... what?! WTF did Darwin ever say about the origins of the freaking universe?

Not when people like yourself assume theory is fact. That is not science – that is zealous support of dogma. Nothing related to evolution as cosmology has been proven by science. The foundation of evolution as cosmology is “something came from nothing” or “a miracle happen in a universe where miracles don’t happen”. Evolution as cosmology is based on an unscientific principle. Some aspects of evolution are scientifically supportable. Orthodox Darwinists believe all of it is.

Do you even remember writing this drivel? How about this challenge: Someone other than LVD explain to me what all this mumbo jumbo means.

You had many more gems, but I've grown tired of this exercise.

exactly HOW MUCH of evolution do you think falls into the category of “reality”

100%. Biological evolution as theory and fact is absolutely the best current idea to explain the diversity of life we see on earth.

400 times – can you provide evidence for this accusation – or is it just more intellectually dishonesty – man, you are on a roll.

I'll let someone else count the responses on the thread posted above. I'm sure I've exaggerated, but not by much.

Are you one of the close-minded know-it-all clowns that is still trying to claim evolution has nothing to do with cosmology.

Yes. As mentioned to you previously, I can't say scientifically, but I'd venture a guess of 99% of all humans who know what evolution is, know it to be a biological theory. As mentioned to you previously, no study on this has been commissioned because stupid ass studies like this don't often get commissioned.