Replies

Note to Ich: LVD is the worst of the worst to try to discuss anything with...I'm not sure you've had the displeasure before. He makes Phaedrus look positively brilliant.

They said I was a Creationist and Fundamentalist Christian (I am neither)

Here's a hanky. ALS calls us "evoloonists" or something. LVD, you've been known to sling a few weak insults as well. But they don't bother me at all, as I'm quite comfortable with myself,

LVD, you are quite possibly the new king of annoyance. You come into threads and somehow spew for hundreds of posts but say nothing. You have your own personal ideas on what "evolution" is that simply doesn't jibe with reality. So be it. You've been deconstructed 400 times by now and some of us (not me, I admit) have patiently tried to spell it out for you that we are talking biology here. The study of life. Not planets, not stars, not pre-life conditions. Those are indeed interesting topics, and deserve to be discussed, but I would think when a thread is about a college professor refusing to recognize creationists as good students because they don't accept the scientific fact of BIOLOGICAL evolution, that you would shut up with your inane "evolution as cosmology" patter.

And ALS, you've been asked dozens of times on this thread to present to us your groundbreaking ideas that will cut the legs from current evolutionary theory. You've been called out for posting supposed damning quotes regarding "emminent scientists" who supposedly support the ID or creationist line of (non) thinking. One guy is shown to be a nutball (Sir Fred Hoyle), you agree you don't accept his ideas on science in general, yet you strangely still defend your cut and paste mis-quote salad. I can't imagine what it's like to be you. I can easily admit when I'm wrong. If I called you a creationist and you state you are not, I was wrong. Now you try it:

Repeat after me:

Cutting and pasting a mish mash of out of context, often deceptively snipped, so-called quotes from people I've never heard of, never researched, never checked for context, never checked for accuracy, is wrong.

Do the honorable thing, ALS. For once.

g3 ...

You atheist/materialists are really going off the deep end.

1,509 posted on 05/16/2003 4:57 AM PDT by gore3000

fC ...

uri geller anarcho loon mind benders alert !

Note to Ich: LVD is the worst of the worst to try to discuss anything with...I'm not sure you've had the displeasure before. He makes Phaedrus look positively brilliant.

I am sorry if I stymie your rigid close-minded thought process

Here's a hanky. ALS calls us "evoloonists" or something. LVD, you've been known to sling a few weak insults as well. But they don't bother me at all, as I'm quite comfortable with myself,

You are correct. I partake of the actions that I complain about in others. I am not proud of this. It is far too easy to fall into the anti-intellectual trap of insults, bold unsupported know-it-allisms, and silly victory dances (your last message is supporting evidence for this position)

You come into threads and somehow spew for hundreds of posts but say nothing.

Just because you don't understand what I am talking about - that does not mean I say nothing.

You have your own personal ideas on what "evolution" is that simply doesn't jibe with reality.

Like what. Be specific. I think we are all very tired of your baseless accusations (and insults and know-it-allisms). Please present MY personal idea of evolution that does not jibe with reality. HINT: you better back it up with supporting evidence (like quotes) – you know-it-all types are always trying to pretend you can read minds. (BTW: exactly HOW MUCH of evolution do you think falls into the category of “reality” – again, please be specific unless you are nothing more that a disrupter)

You've been deconstructed 400 times by now and some of us (not me, I admit) have patiently tried to spell it out for you that we are talking biology here.

400 times – can you provide evidence for this accusation – or is it just more intellectually dishonesty – man, you are on a roll.

Once again you are wrong – I was responding to a thread about the origin of the universe (cosmology) and what should be taught in schools (THAT was the topic of the thread, not biological evolution per se – and I bet you don’t grasp the meaning of per se). BTW: I provided supporting evidence for this position many times but that does not stop you from repeating your disproved statement like a parrot. BTW: that was ANOTHER thread but that did not stop your from reintroducing your disproved statement IS THIS THREAD. CLUE: I was not the one that brought up cosmology in this thread.

that you would shut up with your inane "evolution as cosmology" patter.

Are you one of the close-minded know-it-all clowns that is still trying to claim evolution has nothing to do with cosmology. You can lead a know-it-all to data, but you can’t make them think.

And ALS, you've been asked dozens of times on this thread to present to us your groundbreaking ideas that will cut the legs from current evolutionary theory.

The problem is you know-it-all Orthodox Darwinists apply rules to other people’s statements/theories that your own positions/theories can not meet – that is intellectual dishonesty