Replies

Not once did I state in this thread I was christian, believed in creationism, was a creationist or even believed in God.

That is rigid thinking Orthodox Darwinist Dogma 101 – divert the attention of the opposition by mischaracterizing their statements and beliefs so when they are forced to defend themselves the Darwinist can claim victory. It is a variation of the question “when did you stop beating your wife”

They said I was a Creationist and Fundamentalist Christian (I am neither)

Note to Ich: LVD is the worst of the worst to try to discuss anything with...I'm not sure you've had the displeasure before. He makes Phaedrus look positively brilliant.

They said I was a Creationist and Fundamentalist Christian (I am neither)

Here's a hanky. ALS calls us "evoloonists" or something. LVD, you've been known to sling a few weak insults as well. But they don't bother me at all, as I'm quite comfortable with myself,

LVD, you are quite possibly the new king of annoyance. You come into threads and somehow spew for hundreds of posts but say nothing. You have your own personal ideas on what "evolution" is that simply doesn't jibe with reality. So be it. You've been deconstructed 400 times by now and some of us (not me, I admit) have patiently tried to spell it out for you that we are talking biology here. The study of life. Not planets, not stars, not pre-life conditions. Those are indeed interesting topics, and deserve to be discussed, but I would think when a thread is about a college professor refusing to recognize creationists as good students because they don't accept the scientific fact of BIOLOGICAL evolution, that you would shut up with your inane "evolution as cosmology" patter.

And ALS, you've been asked dozens of times on this thread to present to us your groundbreaking ideas that will cut the legs from current evolutionary theory. You've been called out for posting supposed damning quotes regarding "emminent scientists" who supposedly support the ID or creationist line of (non) thinking. One guy is shown to be a nutball (Sir Fred Hoyle), you agree you don't accept his ideas on science in general, yet you strangely still defend your cut and paste mis-quote salad. I can't imagine what it's like to be you. I can easily admit when I'm wrong. If I called you a creationist and you state you are not, I was wrong. Now you try it:

Repeat after me:

Cutting and pasting a mish mash of out of context, often deceptively snipped, so-called quotes from people I've never heard of, never researched, never checked for context, never checked for accuracy, is wrong.

Do the honorable thing, ALS. For once.