hey aric, you reckon they tied up the menfolk, raped the womenfolk and that was their master plan?
No, he did not. He posted a *HYPOTHETICAL EXCHANGE*, clearly marked as such (e.g., it was introduced with, "OK, let's say that we are in a creationism debate, OK?"), in which he was making the point that it *would* be intellectually dishonest for him to challenge someone to "prove their theory" (among other things).
And then you *still* failed to understand that after he *explained it to you*.
- and you have the nerve to call me stupid.
With damned good reason. Allow me to second the motion.
You just don't get it.
He gets it just fine. You're still a few kilometers from being within viewing distance of "getting it" yet.
Why should you - you are here to disrupt, not debate or exchange ideas.
Uh huh... In order to properly characterize his posts properly, it would help if you *understood* them first.
hey aric, you reckon they tied up the menfolk, raped the womenfolk and that was their master plan?
You are not too quick on the uptake. I was sick of Aric2000 sniping from the sidelines and disrupting debates so I decided to give him a dose of his own medicine.
That is the nature of sideline sniping – jumping in with unrelated and often incorrect statements that force the person that is actually debating to address the sniping thus turning the debate into a meaningless food fight.
Uh huh... In order to properly characterize his posts properly, it would help if you *understood* them first
Sorry to embarrass you, but you are the one that did not understand.
BTW: your “biological evolution has no connection to cosmology” is a snipe. It is a factually incorrect statement meant to disrupt the debate.