Oh, puh-leaze.
That's a mighty big straw man you've got there:
As you well know from the countless prior threads on this topic -- but are desperately trying to pretend you don't -- is that insisting that science students accept current scientific views in order to get a letter of recommendation attesting to their fitness to practice science is in no way an exercise in "dogma" or declaring oneself to have "authoritative" answers. It is, quite simply, the proper way to accredit someone (or not) for the field they profess an interest in.
And no amount of your scornful one-liners (most of which do not even address the point being made, except to emptily reject it) will change that.
If a student wants a science degree, they're going to have to accept the fundamentals of science. If they want to reject the basic foundations, they need to find another career.
Similarly, divinity schools are well within their rights and the bounds of common sense to reject giving letters of recommendation to atheists who openly reject what the school was formed to teach.
Get over it, and stop making mountains out of molehills, or pretending that you don't grasp what has already been explained to you countless times. If you're playing dumb, you're not helping your case any. And if you're not playing at it, go find something more your level to discuss and stop wasting our time.