Wow, what a masterful rebuttal, which properly deals with all the points being made and explains the evidence in a new light.
Oh, wait, no it isn't.
Do you really think this sort of thing helps your case?
But allow me to respond in kind:
"...when a great genius appears in the world the dunces are all in confederacy against him" -- Jonathan SwiftNote the wide confederacy against Darwin, and the quality of their "contributions" to the subject, such as the illustrious "ALS".
Yup, and all you can do to prove them wrong is insult them by calling them names and play rhetorical games. Let's see the evidence for evolution. You call it science, there must be scientific evidence for it. Let's see it. Let's also see the exact theory of evolution on which all these 'scientists' are working to prove. After all, to prove a theory you must first have a theory do you not? Let's see the theory and the proof for that theory. It must be awful strong for you to be able to call everyone who disagrees an idiot, must it not? Or are your strong words just a bluff to hide the total emptiness of your theory?