Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
"We must consider ...the long-term financial considerations because of the high cost of medical care for people who have cancer or emphysema."

Anti-smoking fanatics always mention these increased health costs but I think they are lying.

People who get lung cancer tend to die within a relatively short time.

Yes, there are medical costs for some time. But, then the smoker is dead and the government saves the Social Security payments he would have otherwise received.

Has there ever been a study on the long term differences in medical costs for smokers vs. non-smokers?

17 posted on 04/28/2003 5:08:30 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 07055
Has there ever been a study on the long term differences in medical costs for smokers vs. non-smokers?>>

That's a good question.
20 posted on 04/28/2003 7:59:41 PM PDT by Coleus (RU-486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: 07055
Check out

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/834170/posts

It's about how they manipulate these figures.

Shelion does a great breakdown for the USA in post #16
28 posted on 04/29/2003 9:14:43 PM PDT by qam1 (Compared to George Pataki -> Hillary Clinton and Grey Davis are ultra-right wingers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson