Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
First, I said on this forum about two days after the war started that I was EXTREMELY skeptical that there ever was a "shock and awe" strategy. It was a media prop, and a ruse, to conceal our true plans. There was NEVER any intention to put out the lights, or otherwise destroy "infrastructure." But the Iraqis were prepared for this, and had their AA drawn back to Baghdad. I think when the full story of this is out, "Shock and Awe" will go down right next to the Schwartzkopf "hey diddle, diddle, right up the middle" feint in Gulf War I.
22 posted on 04/28/2003 10:27:42 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: LS
You are correct, we *wanted* him to pull the forces back to baghdad, the better to clear the way there.

The whole campaign was "shock and awe" in that we had a tempo that destroyed the enemies ability to respond and because we had an overwhelming advantage that created an inevitability of victory. It was not just airpower advantage but on the groud as well.
23 posted on 04/28/2003 11:25:30 AM PDT by WOSG (All Hail The Free Republic of Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson