Skip to comments.
BUSH SAYS IRAQI WAR WAS EXTENDED BECAUSE OF TURKEY
menewsline.com ^
| 04/28/2003 08:59:42
| MENL
Posted on 04/28/2003 8:06:12 AM PDT by Destro
Last Updated: 04/28/2003 08:59:42 Middle East
BUSH SAYS IRAQI WAR WAS EXTENDED BECAUSE OF TURKEY
WASHINGTON [MENL] -- The United States has again blamed Turkey for a failure of the Pentagon's "shock and awe" strategy against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
U.S. President George Bush said Turkey's refusal to allow American forces to enter that country to form a second front in northern Iraq was a major blow to the coalition against Saddam. Bush said the result was that Saddam was able to concentrate all of his forces around Baghdad.
Bush said the absence of a northern front reduced the element of surprise against the Saddam regime. The result, he said, was an improvement in Iraqi combat as Saddam moved his forces from north to south.
"Shock and awe said to many people that all we've got to do is unleash some might and people will crumble," Bush said in a television interview on Thursday. "And it turns out the fighters were a lot fiercer than we thought. Because, for example, we didn't come north from Turkey, Saddam Hussein was able to move a lot of special Republican Guard units and fighters from north to south. So the resistance for our troops moving south and north was significant resistance."
NOTE: The above is not the full item.
This service contains only a small portion of the information produced daily by Middle East Newsline. For a subscription to the full service, please contact Middle East Newsline at: editor@menewsline.com for further details.
(Excerpt) Read more at menewsline.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqifreedom; nonallyturkey; turkey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: johniegrad; Destro
I think that the so-called "failure" of "Shock & Awe" is a non-starter. The campaign, as envisioned by the author of the concept, never occurred. We changed the battle plan right from the very beginning - we
were supposed to begin with a couple of days of "Shock & Awe" bombing, but circumstances changed a bit and the ground forces went in right from the start. [This, by the way, shows our great flexibility, and should shock the Hell out of any future opponents]. The bombing version of S & A never got a fair chance to be demonstrated, so how could it have failed?
Nonetheless, with our hands and feet tied by the Turks and French, we still won in 3 weeks. That shocked and awed much of the world, despite it not being the S & A campaign as originally represented to the world. Either way, I don't really care - all that matters is that we won in only 3 weeks with minimal casualties.
To: Destro
First, I said on this forum about two days after the war started that I was EXTREMELY skeptical that there ever was a "shock and awe" strategy. It was a media prop, and a ruse, to conceal our true plans. There was NEVER any intention to put out the lights, or otherwise destroy "infrastructure." But the Iraqis were prepared for this, and had their AA drawn back to Baghdad. I think when the full story of this is out, "Shock and Awe" will go down right next to the Schwartzkopf "hey diddle, diddle, right up the middle" feint in Gulf War I.
22
posted on
04/28/2003 10:27:42 AM PDT
by
LS
To: LS
You are correct, we *wanted* him to pull the forces back to baghdad, the better to clear the way there.
The whole campaign was "shock and awe" in that we had a tempo that destroyed the enemies ability to respond and because we had an overwhelming advantage that created an inevitability of victory. It was not just airpower advantage but on the groud as well.
23
posted on
04/28/2003 11:25:30 AM PDT
by
WOSG
(All Hail The Free Republic of Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
To: Destro
Even with Turkey doing a back-flip on letting us invade from the North, and France and Russia giving Saddam daily updates on our plans, I think our military did indeed 'shock and awe' the entire world.
24
posted on
04/28/2003 12:22:40 PM PDT
by
WaterDragon
(Only America has the moral authority and the resolve to lead the world in the 21st Century.)
To: WOSG
I agree that was the impact, but I still think the term "shock and awe" was a deliberate deception to mislead the journalists and Saddam into what our intentions were.
25
posted on
04/28/2003 12:55:55 PM PDT
by
LS
To: LS
"I still think the term "shock and awe" was a deliberate deception to mislead the journalists and Saddam into what our intentions were."
yeah, and that deception was "shock and awe" too!!
( the Real shock and awe concept was about so disrupting the thought patterns of the enemy they couldnt effectively counter anything. IMHO it worked! )
26
posted on
04/28/2003 6:07:12 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(All Hail The Free Republic of Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
To: WOSG
No kidding. But the concept the journalists were operating under---and the one they passed along to Saddam---was that it was going to look like Dresden or Hamburg in 1944. We may have dropped a lot of munitions, but the precision was what was really awe-inspiring.
27
posted on
04/28/2003 6:21:58 PM PDT
by
LS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson