Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/27/2003 3:37:13 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lando Lincoln
Bingo.

We might make some progress by calling them "socialists" rather than "liberals." The strange mixture of libertine hedonism and totalitarian statism that comes out of the mouth of the average liberal certainly challenges the capacity of logic. It would seem doubtful that the average Democrat has any realization of just how illogical, absurd, and deranged the whole enterprise is.

2 posted on 04/27/2003 3:45:54 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
*
3 posted on 04/27/2003 3:47:27 PM PDT by rdb3 (It ain't nuthin' to a ballah, baby...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
socialism bump - read later
4 posted on 04/27/2003 4:13:46 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
A grand slam, it explains all of the symptoms of the Liberalism virus..
7 posted on 04/27/2003 5:12:12 PM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
great post
9 posted on 04/27/2003 6:24:32 PM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Great Find
10 posted on 04/27/2003 6:28:04 PM PDT by orlop9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Now we can shed ourselves and lay on them this "neo" business. I'm all for calling their strains "neo-liberal," "paleo-liberal" and "liberal-liberal."

How 'bout also using "gothic liberal," "homo-liberal" and "bi-liberal"? "Trans-bi-gay-liberal" anyone?

We can then go after the Naderites with "un-progressive" or the more accurate, more simple, and most elegant, "stupid."
11 posted on 04/27/2003 8:17:47 PM PDT by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump.
12 posted on 04/28/2003 9:48:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Thanks for posting this excellent article. I have book marked it.

For any of the left wing isms, socialism, communism, facism, Islamofacism, Enviralism or whatever dark side ism to succeed. They must have total control of the media.

The media then can cover their crimes and their revising of history both short term and long term history.

Thanks to the internet, Fox news, conservative talk radio shows and Free Republic, the leftisms no longer controls the media.

The Leftisms cannot stand being exposed to the reality of truth.
13 posted on 04/28/2003 10:24:48 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Correction. The Left is NOT anti-globalization, per se. They are opposed to globalizing forces that they can't control. Although the leftist media refers to "globalization" in terms of markets/corporations, the phenomenon includes the spread of largely Leftist NGOs, growth of UN power, the ICC, etc (and the Left LOVES these aspects of globalization). Most on the Left want a world socialist government (internationalist), and the Soviet empire promised them a world soviet, but failed. Many parties worldwide are now organized in the Socialist International.

The most remarkable development on the Left in the last 20 years has been the near total obliteration of any trace of LaSallian and nationalist influences in the social democratic parties -- they have all betrayed the nationalist roots of the early SDPs (and become more Leninist). Concurrently, many "ex"-communist parties -- freed of the imperial dictates of the Soviet empire, which required occupation regimes and fifth columns to support "socialism in national form" in various countries (and alliances with the "socialist commonwealth") -- are now migrating towards strict internationalist and permanent revolution/Trotskyite doctrines. This internationalist drift of many parties on the Left reflects a pro-globalization agenda, but ON THEIR TERMS.




15 posted on 04/29/2003 10:32:14 AM PDT by CaptIsaacDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
MGM Everyone misses it! Just connect the dots and you can see what the Lefties-socialists and many Democrats are. The dots are MGM.....Marcuse-Garmsci-Marz.......M for Herbert Marcuse, the Father of Socialism in the US and a student at the leftwing Socialist Franfurt School....G for Antonio Gramsci...an Italian leftist socialist...wrote a plan to help the left take over the world with their Socialist ideas. First, get the media (already done here with ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, NPR...Washington Post, NY Times,atc.,etc....) Second, get the schools (well under way with the Leftists in the major universities, the NEA and local schools falling all the time to their ideas). Third, get the churches and religion from which origionally sprang our national values. Look at the National Council of Churches (so far left it hurts) Catholic Church not far behind, plus lets ban God from everything, which the courts are having some success at doing with help from the ACLU. Finally M is of course for Marx. What more needs to be said? He and his followers were clear in their long term goals. World domination by Communism-Socialism. Over a number of generations....well under way. Thats MGM and its is happening all around us.
Marcuse-Garmsci-Marx....MGM....MGM. Just look and you will see it.
16 posted on 05/06/2003 9:49:20 PM PDT by joemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson