Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antaresequity
Even if they can't tell a body from a log it was probably worth investigating. About the right size, about the right shape...

Your data that the water in the area is shallow makes the notion that it was disturbed by a passing boat more credible to me.

As someone who knows the area well, what's your take on this?
52 posted on 04/28/2003 4:03:25 AM PDT by libertylover (Grateful to all who have served.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: libertylover
Even if they can't tell a body from a log it was probably worth investigating. About the right size, about the right shape...

Not necessarily. There's a lot of cr@p located in shipping channels and beneath bridges. You'd be amazed at the stuff people chose to dispose of in a body of water. Bridges are convenient for a quick dump, but a deepwater channel presents different challenges. Many heavy ships use depthfinders to make sure that they stay in the designated channel. You'd need to shutdown most commercial shipping to be able to do a dive operation because you can't have divers in the water with sonar banging away.

Also, depths of over 130 fsw require decompression for the divers. This may be the chief reason that the Navy is using marine mammals to identify sea mines -- it conserves your divers for mine clearing activities.

53 posted on 04/28/2003 5:27:04 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson