To: Shooter 2.5
do you automatically condem one and not the other? HELL YES!!! Why? Wonder if the woman had a gun too, and simply didn't shoot as fast as the man. Would that make a difference? Is it because the one who shot the gun is a man? If the woman had shot the man would you still say that? What about if the man had been abusive towards the woman? What if it was proven the woman was abusive towards the man? would that make a difference? What if it was proven he had a brain tumor and that affected his resonses?
107 posted on
04/27/2003 3:20:11 PM PDT by
FirstTomato
(Always remember you are unique. Just like everyone else.)
To: FirstTomato
I want you to think about all of the judicial motions that are made to execute a serial killer.
Did she deserve to be executed? Yes or no.
118 posted on
04/27/2003 3:31:39 PM PDT by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: FirstTomato
"Why? Wonder if the woman had a gun too, and simply didn't shoot as fast as the man."You have entered into the parallel world of pure conjecture.
134 posted on
04/27/2003 4:33:57 PM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson