Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dixie Chicks launch full-frontal attack - "not...standing their ground...pushing it even farther"
The Dallas Morning News ^ | April 25, 2003 | By TOM MAURSTAD / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 04/26/2003 11:35:34 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

Dixie Chicks launch full-frontal attack


04/25/2003

By TOM MAURSTAD / The Dallas Morning News

You're a platinum-selling country star riding a record-setting wave of popularity. But a few weeks ago, you made a comment during a concert that has angered and alienated your core constituency.

What do you do?

If you're the Dixie Chicks, you pose naked on the cover of Entertainment Weekly.

This latest move is likely to turn up the flames on a controversy that has been burning for more than a month. That's a feeling echoed by program directors at the area's two leading country-music stations, neither of which has played a Dixie Chicks' song since early March when singer Natalie Maines told a London audience she was ashamed that President Bush is from Texas.

Under the headline "Dixie Chicks Come Clean," the May 2 issue shows the country-music trio posed in a pyramid of bare skin. Across their torsos are painted phrases – "Traitors," "Saddam's Angels," "Shut Up!" – drawn from the volumes of letters and e-mails the band has received.

Also Online
Video: Local radio station weighs in on whether to continue Chicks ban
In the tradition of mainstream magazines featuring nude celebrities on their covers (Janet Jackson on Rolling Stone, Demi Moore on Vanity Fair), the Dixie Chicks are positioned in such a way – a hand here, a leg there – that no private parts are exposed. Such attention to the technicalities of nudity does nothing to diminish the provocative nature of the image.

(And in answer to the first question this photograph will spark, an Entertainment Weekly spokeswoman asserts: "That's them, their bodies. There were no computer tricks, no airbrushing.")

With the women's unflinching stares into the camera and the blurb's promise of "Country's Controversial Superstars Take on Their Critics," the cover is striking, even defiant.

"We wanted to show the absurdity of the extreme names people have been calling us," fiddle player Martie Maguire says in the story.

The Dixie Chicks ... stirring up more controversy with their upcoming <I> Entertainment Weekly </I> cover photo.
AP
The Dixie Chicks ... stirring up more controversy with their upcoming Entertainment Weekly cover photo.

The attention-getting cover story comes on the heels of the group's interview this week with Diane Sawyer on ABC's Primetime Thursday . Publicity campaigns undertaken by celebrities who have fallen from their public's graces are nothing new. But traditionally the celebrity is practicing some form of damage control – a high-profile mea culpa or by going silent on the subject.

But not the Dixie Chicks. Far from throwing water on the fire, they seem to be throwing gasoline.

"What this reflects is that the old damage control just doesn't work anymore because everybody knows the playbook," says Robert Thompson, a professor of pop culture and television at Syracuse University. "Everybody is so media savvy now that if you apologize, people just dismiss it as what your consultant told you to say."

A band representative on Thursday said the singers had no comment on the cover photograph or the interview. But others in country music certainly have.

"I don't know that they'll ever be as big with the country audience as they used to or as important to the country audience as they used to be," says Paul Williams, program director of KPLX-FM (99.5) "The Wolf."

"At first I thought it was a joke," says Ted Stecker, program director for KSCS-FM (96.3), of the Entertainment Weekly cover. "I don't think it's a good move for them right now.

Unlike other outspoken celebrities, such as rocker Sheryl Crow or activist director Michael Moore, whose anti-war comments have generally been applauded by their fans, the Dixie Chicks' comments play against country music's bedrock fans.

"You could write off the comment that started all this as something said in the excitement of the moment," says Leo Braudy, author of The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and its History. "But what's going on now is the result of calculation.

"It's a pretty striking strategy. Rather than backing down and appearing on the cover waving a flag or dressed in military uniforms, they are not just standing their ground, they're pushing it even farther."

Staff critic Mario Tarradell contributed to this report.

E-mail tmaurstad@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/latestnews/stories/042503dnovechicks.18b99.html


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
I've been away from my computer for a couple of days. This article appeared in the Dallas Morning News yesterday and I had to post this.

These idiots are looking to commit suicide with their predominately Conservative audience. It's hard for me to believe they don't see that OR they think think this is a principled stand. Dolts, ALL of them for this stunt, imho. The statement made my Maines apparently is held/believed by ALL of them based on their action here.

If they wish to continue a career in entertainment, they may have to get away from C & W. I hope they suffer a fatal career meltdown after their statement and now this ! . . .

Unlike other outspoken celebrities, such as rocker Sheryl Crow or activist director Michael Moore, whose anti-war comments have generally been applauded by their fans, the Dixie Chicks' comments play against country music's bedrock fans.

"You could write off the comment that started all this as something said in the excitement of the moment," says Leo Braudy, author of The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and its History. "But what's going on now is the result of calculation.

"It's a pretty striking strategy. Rather than backing down and appearing on the cover waving a flag or dressed in military uniforms, they are not just standing their ground, they're pushing it even farther."


1 posted on 04/26/2003 11:35:34 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
They're finished.
2 posted on 04/26/2003 11:37:02 AM PDT by NetValue (Militant Islam first swarms the states it will later dominate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
SHOOT SELVES IN FOOT ONCE AGIN, SO TO SPEAK!!!!<P.
3 posted on 04/26/2003 11:37:33 AM PDT by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
There was a guy on Fox last night who said he was waiting for Maines to proclaim that Dale Earnhardt wasn't "all that" and that NASCAR was stupid. Thus, TOTALLY alienating their fan base.
4 posted on 04/26/2003 11:38:14 AM PDT by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Great advice for women everywhere: When in doubt, take your clothes off !
Works for me.
5 posted on 04/26/2003 11:39:29 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Clinger; GeronL; Billie; Slyfox; San Jacinto; SpookBrat; FITZ; DainBramage; COB1; ...
Dixie Chicks launch full-frontal attack -
"not...standing their ground...pushing it even farther",

Unlike other outspoken celebrities, such as rocker Sheryl Crow or activist director Michael Moore, whose anti-war comments have generally been applauded by their fans, the Dixie Chicks' comments play against country music's bedrock fans.

"You could write off the comment that started all this as something said in the excitement of the moment," says Leo Braudy, author of The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and its History. "But what's going on now is the result of calculation.

"It's a pretty striking strategy. Rather than backing down and appearing on the cover waving a flag or dressed in military uniforms, they are not just standing their ground, they're pushing it even farther."



Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Texas or General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.

6 posted on 04/26/2003 11:40:14 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
LOL !
7 posted on 04/26/2003 11:41:27 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Yep ! bttt . . .
8 posted on 04/26/2003 11:42:29 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
an Entertainment Weekly spokeswoman asserts: "That's them, their bodies. There were no computer tricks, no airbrushing.</>. Natalies Maines husband would kill his dog if it would make that body hers.
9 posted on 04/26/2003 11:42:31 AM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"That's them, their bodies. There were no computer tricks, no airbrushing."

Sure. Even the chubby one? And they all are the exact same shade of tan and not one has a single tan line anywhere? It's at the very least airbrushed but is probably even more fake than that.

10 posted on 04/26/2003 11:43:54 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
Natalies Maines husband would kill his dog if it would make that body hers!

No lie! I said that pic was photoshopped the first time I saw it. That or Natalie has lost about 40 pounds in ten days!
11 posted on 04/26/2003 11:44:27 AM PDT by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"If they wish to continue a career in entertainment, they may have to get away from C & W."

That's exactly what I believe they are trying to do. Their first response was to try to make this go away. It wouldn't. So after the non-apology apologies predictably fell flat, they shifted to an attitude calculated to appeal to the left. I foresee a change in their style, repertoire and concert venue.

12 posted on 04/26/2003 11:45:41 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Maybe her clothes just make her look fat ----if the picture is real, then she should just stay naked.
13 posted on 04/26/2003 11:45:46 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jos65
When they shoot themselves in the foot, they empty the clip.
14 posted on 04/26/2003 11:47:51 AM PDT by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Only on magazine covers does the camera lie. Watch one of their videos. If that's her on that cover, I'll eat my hat.
15 posted on 04/26/2003 11:47:54 AM PDT by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
"Natalies Maines husband would kill his dog if it would make that body hers."

Exactly. The EW spokeswoman is lying in her teeth. You compare that photo to every existing candid shot of Maines and there is no way that is her body. IMO all of their bodies have been altered in the cover shot.

16 posted on 04/26/2003 11:48:48 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I'm getting so tired of the people in the media whining about people who don't like what the Chicks have said. If Rush Limbaugh's or Bill O'Reilly's fanbases got insulted over something they said, and started burning their books, those same people in the media would be hailing it as free speech on the part of the American people. And, I don't for a second believe that it was an off-the-cuff remark.
17 posted on 04/26/2003 11:48:54 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Well, a celebrity has free speech, just like you and me. And just like you and me, they can speak anonymosly as in FR--or they can use their own names and take the consequences to their reputations and their celebrity status. But a celebrity cannot simultaneously
employ her fame to amplify her voice and

insulate herself and her reputation from the reaction of the public to what she says.


18 posted on 04/26/2003 11:49:01 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
They probably have been thinking about moving over to pop in the future anyway. But they seem to be spitting in the face of the crowd that got them this far. Unappreciative, selfish people. This whole thing will not end up good for the group in the long.
19 posted on 04/26/2003 11:49:18 AM PDT by usastandsunited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Courtesy of Registered.


20 posted on 04/26/2003 11:49:31 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson