Wonderful. Here we go again. Think 'A.N.S.W.E.R.' or 'Iraqi Peace Watch', or '(Darwinist) Voices of the Wildnerness' or some other such retarded pacifist groups will take up the challenge?
Anyone out there hope that they do?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo
Great!! But, this time, let's make sure those miniature transmiters that we put in the fillings in in their teeth actually work.
2 posted on
04/25/2003 12:08:25 PM PDT by
Tacis
To: AmericanInTokyo
I'm better the NKs will set off a nuclear explosion in the next few days. Any guesses where ?
To: AmericanInTokyo
Given that a substantial number of the Iraqi "shields" were actually providing intel and target guidance to the oncoming forces, sounds like a winner to me.
5 posted on
04/25/2003 12:13:48 PM PDT by
commandante_zero
(One MOAB can mess up a whole afternoon)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Do they have Isreali Caterpillars over there???
6 posted on
04/25/2003 12:14:10 PM PDT by
fish hawk
To: AmericanInTokyo
Please Please PLEASE send Uzma!!!
I vote for her. She would be a good one!!
Becki
7 posted on
04/25/2003 12:14:18 PM PDT by
Becki
(Pray continually for our leaders and our troops!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
To: AmericanInTokyo
To: AmericanInTokyo
The UN is the only major world body that has NGOs as part of its structure. This is because real governments don't have NGOs. The UN is itself an NGO.
10 posted on
04/25/2003 12:17:43 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Send 'em.
They'll be in for a real surprise when they see what North Korea is like.
To: AmericanInTokyo
Excellent opportunity to infiltrate CIA agents to shine the targeting lasers on the reactors.
To: AmericanInTokyo
"British Prime Minister Tony Blair has publicly said that North Korea will be the next target for the U.S. military attack...in the "war program" pushed by the United States with the help of Britain and Japan."
What? I have not run across this statement by Blair. Anyone else?
15 posted on
04/25/2003 12:23:45 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(Pray for our Troops)
To: AmericanInTokyo
I'm confused. Pyongyang threatens to attack the US daily...you know, "sea of fire" and all that. The US has said for months it is eager to meet with the North under certain conditions to seek a diplomatic solution.
So with the North CLEARLY the aggressive party, why aren't there human shields in LA or Hawaii or Anchorage? You know, to protect those cities from attack?
To: AmericanInTokyo
And lets make sure N.K. know that the human shields are probably C.I.A. That should take care of the idiots for a long time.
17 posted on
04/25/2003 12:25:28 PM PDT by
techcor
(Admin Moderator wannabe)
To: AmericanInTokyo
I do. Great opportunity to slip in some spies.
To: AmericanInTokyo
What a swell idea!
19 posted on
04/25/2003 12:28:10 PM PDT by
Gritty
To: AmericanInTokyo
If they do go and we do exactly what we did in Iraq, wait a couple of months, there won't be much left but well-picked bones. I'm trying to think of a down side to that...
To: AmericanInTokyo
Yes! Yes!!! *YES*!!!!!!
22 posted on
04/25/2003 12:30:41 PM PDT by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
OK, OK, let me get this straight. The people who normally go for this human shield clap-trap are usually far left liberals who are also against nuclear power and nuclear weapons. So, following their own twisted logic, they feel the need to go to North Korea and guard their nuclear facilities? The world just gets weirder and weirder.
23 posted on
04/25/2003 12:31:04 PM PDT by
FourPeas
To: AmericanInTokyo
Yep, they can glow in the dark, or at least what's left of them.
To: AmericanInTokyo
NO WAR FOR RICE!!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson