Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rockinonritalin
Yes, indeed. I would guess that Clinton offered this as a solution, knowing full well that he had talked Chirac into vetoing it.

However, all's well that ends well, and now Clinton is apparently trying to portray himself as the big diplo-expert.

That train has left the station, and no one cares how cozy he is with the French.

What I really want to know is if Clinton's name shows up in those boxes that the reporters found with all sorts of letters to and from the Saddam regime. I will not be one it surprised.

31 posted on 04/24/2003 7:46:49 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
Since sad little tommy declared the diplomacy a total bust, I guess we know now whose diplomacy he was talking about .... :-)
38 posted on 04/24/2003 7:50:02 PM PDT by kayak (Pray for President Bush, our troops, and our nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
"I would guess that Clinton offered this as a solution, knowing full well that he had talked Chirac into vetoing it"

Yep. I would bet that Clinton told Chirac to announce his intention to use his security council veto. Sounds like a Clinton move to me.

146 posted on 04/24/2003 9:55:09 PM PDT by ElephantMan (When will friends of Bill start to understand how dangerous it is to listen to him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson