Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SARS outbreak in UK 'inevitable'
The Scotsman ^ | 4-24-03 | FRANK URQUHART & PAUL GALLAGHER

Posted on 04/24/2003 6:52:37 PM PDT by Prince Charles

SARS outbreak in UK 'inevitable'

FRANK URQUHART AND PAUL GALLAGHER

AN OUTBREAK of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is inevitable in Britain and will stretch NHS resources to breaking point, the country's leading microbiology expert warned yesterday.

Professor Hugh Pennington, of Aberdeen University, said health officials would be forced to implement emergency plans drawn up to deal with a bio-terrorism attack to tackle the impending crisis.

"It will get about and will be with us for the foreseeable future," Prof Pennington told The Scotsman. "We have to prepare for it to come."

He added that even a small outbreak of the disease would cause "mayhem" in the National Health Service, as entire intensive care units would be devoted to treating SARS sufferers.

As China began implementing draconian quarantine measures to contain the spread of the disease yesterday, Dr Liam Fox, the shadow health secretary, described the UK government's response to the threat of an outbreak as "feeble, complacent and irresponsible".

Dr Fox called for SARS to be classified a notifiable disease under the Public Health Act, giving officials the power to force patients to receive treatment and ensure others were not exposed to the virus.

He said: "All around the world, SARS is causing immense alarm. Here, on the other hand, ministers' conduct would make people think that nothing serious is going on.

"The only sensible way for the government to proceed is to make SARS a notifiable disease."

One of the world's leading experts warned yesterday that unless the virus is dealt with quickly, a second - and larger - wave of cases could emerge.

Dr Donald S Burke, writing in The Scotsman today, said: "Epidemic-control efforts should not simply be maintained, but doubled, and redoubled again."

Four more SARS deaths were reported in the Chinese capital of Beijing yesterday, and authorities have sealed off entire villages, along with the People's Hospital of Beijing University, where more than 100 infected patients are being treated.

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), the flu-like virus has killed more than 260 people and infected more than 4,500 worldwide after being spread from Asia by airline passengers. The organisation has advised travellers to avoid visiting Toronto, in Canada, Hong Kong, Beijing and the Guangdong and Shanxi provinces of China.

Economists at the World Bank said the impact of the SARS virus, along with the aftermath of war in Iraq, could knock almost one-sixth of a per cent off economic growth in Asia this year.

The Canadian government strongly protested to the World Health Organisation yesterday for advising travellers to avoid Toronto, the scene of the worst SARS outbreak outside Asia, with 16 fatalities.

"There is no evidence of casual transmission of the disease in Toronto," said Dr Paul Gully, a Canadian government health officer. "We challenge the WHO?s assertion that Toronto is an unsafe place to visit."

So far, only six suspected cases have been found in Britain, none of which has been fatal. All of the cases involved patients who contracted the virus overseas, but it emerged yesterday that a Thai woman in hospital in Bangkok with suspected SARS may have contracted the virus in London.

During a recent visit to Britain, She was in contact with a Chinese businessman who may have passed on the virus.

Health officials said 140 children from Hong Kong and China, quarantined on the Isle of Wight a week ago, have so far shown no sign of the illness.

Prof Pennington, Scotland's leading microbiologist, who led the investigation into the E coli 0157 outbreak in Wishaw, said the quarantine measures in China and elsewhere were not sufficient to prevent SARS spreading around the globe, and he expected a significant outbreak in Britain within months.

"When it does come - even though the number of cases are small - it might well create mayhem because it will mean that a large chunk of a hospital will have to dedicate itself to SARS at the expense of ordinary run-of-the-mill activity," he said.

SARS was first detected in southern China and has spread to more than 20 countries.

Symptoms are similar to pneumonia, with sufferers complaining of coughing, raging temperatures and sore throats. There is no cure and the mortality rate is between 5 and 6 per cent.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: donaldburke; fatalityrate; rate; sars

1 posted on 04/24/2003 6:52:37 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Our last opportunity to eradicate SARS menace
2 posted on 04/24/2003 7:01:36 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Thanks for two great articles!
3 posted on 04/24/2003 7:12:48 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: per loin; CathyRyan; aristeides; Domestic Church
From the 2nd article posted by Prince Charles:

"...Next winter, we may not be so lucky. If influenza and SARS epidemics strike simultaneously, confusion will reign.

"As summer approaches and the SARS epidemic declines, there will be an understandable urge to celebrate. But we must eschew premature celebrations and self-congratulations. History teaches us that the devastating 1918 influenza epidemic began with a modest "herald wave" in spring that faded away during the summer, only to explode and wreck global devastation the following autumn and winter. It is possible that SARS, now seeded around the globe, could follow a similar pattern and fade away this summer, only to erupt again next winter.

"The 1918 epidemic claimed the lives of over 20 million people in a single year. "La Grippe", as it was known, killed more people than the First World War, which saw nine million die. This influenza pandemic claimed more victims in the US than all of their armed conflicts of the 20th century - and America was one of the least affected countries with approximately 850,000 deaths from 20 million cases..."

This has been my concern for some time, as some of you may recall, that the coming fall and winter will show us the true face of SARS, unmasked (so to speak).

4 posted on 04/24/2003 11:21:50 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Twenty million in a single year...800,000 in the US...and SARS has a higher mortality rate, no matter WHOSE figures are used, than the 1918 flu...
5 posted on 04/24/2003 11:23:45 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
This has been my concern for some time, as some of you may recall, that the coming fall and winter will show us the true face of SARS, unmasked (so to speak).

I'm hoping that you are wrong, that this is its face, but I'd not bet money against you on it.

6 posted on 04/24/2003 11:51:13 PM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: per loin
I'm concerned.

I could be wrong, of course. It may die out this spring and summer, and never be heard from again...it may be one of the myriad viruses that hit the radar and go away...leaving the world more or less as it found it.

Garden variety flu is bad enough.
7 posted on 04/24/2003 11:55:20 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Just re-reading some of the articles:

Over 20 million died worldwide in a single year from the flu, in 1918. 20 million in the US caught the disease, and over 850,000 US citizens died in ONE year! I am so amazed that scientists are as alarmed as they are...Did you see the doctor who had SARS and recovered, from Toronto, on O'Reilly tonight? He had what he called a mild case...didn't sound too mild to me. If that's MILD SARS, then the severe cases must really be devastating.

I hope it goes away.
8 posted on 04/25/2003 12:00:34 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Here's another gloomy thing to report:

Ribavirin can decrease lung function. It's a side effect. Ribavirin and prednisone are the meds most commonly given to SARS sufferers, that's what the Toronto doctor said he was given. IV ribavirin, which he was given, is experimental at this time.
9 posted on 04/25/2003 12:07:19 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
This is getting worse and worse.

I know some people have recovered from SARS. Has anyone tried to get the blood of some of the people who have recovered from SARS, using their antibodies as a base to culture a treatment against the SARS infection in people who have just gotten it?

10 posted on 04/25/2003 12:10:47 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
No, I didn't see that. In fact I've seen little on recovered victims, other than the story about the nurse. Sounded like it was going to be some time before she was fully recovered.

The disease sounds terrible, and I think so many impoverished Asians have no idea of the disaster looming for them.

11 posted on 04/25/2003 12:13:02 AM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Yes, I've read of exactly that treatment being used in Hong Kong (or at least the same principle). Not sure how well it's helping.
12 posted on 04/25/2003 12:16:44 AM PDT by LPStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: handk
No thanks. Do not post ads for products.
16 posted on 04/25/2003 1:24:12 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
God Forbid my "removed" post actually saved someone's life from SARS, but wait, you "removed" it. I don't have any "vested interest" in the product, I was simply passing along the info. Geez!
17 posted on 04/25/2003 1:34:49 AM PDT by handk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson