Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House & RNC Issue Gag Order on Santorum Issue
Harrisburg News and the Hotline ^ | April 24, 2003 | Chuck Todd and Vaughn Ververs

Posted on 04/24/2003 12:01:16 PM PDT by ewing

The Harrisburg Patriot News Decoursey reports that Senator Rick Santorums (R-PA) defenders are now under gag order.

White House and Republican National Committee officials told GOP insiders yesterday by conference call, voice mail and e-mail not to comment about Santorum's comments letting them speak for himself.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: dncsetup; dontfeedbeast; hillary; homosexualagenda; hrc; jfkerry; media; rnc; rove; santorum; strategery; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-240 next last
To: ewing
I stand corrected, but I was referring to the current crop of Republican Senators - Sentorum's peers.
81 posted on 04/24/2003 12:57:54 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Get over it. Trent is gone, and he did it to himself.
82 posted on 04/24/2003 1:00:10 PM PDT by hchutch (America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Karl Rove understands that when somebody's digging a hole, let him use his own shovel.

Does this mean no bushbots on the Santorum threads?

83 posted on 04/24/2003 1:01:04 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Yep.

Jim Jordan was a big player in the DSCC for a while. He's now John F. Kerry's campaign manager. The reporter who MISQUOTED Santorum is his apparently his wife.
84 posted on 04/24/2003 1:02:08 PM PDT by hchutch (America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: hchutch
that is a big joke, people here that stood with the rats did it to him.
86 posted on 04/24/2003 1:03:39 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Do you think this is true? I stand with Santorum against the rest!

So do I!

87 posted on 04/24/2003 1:04:20 PM PDT by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I stand 110% behind Santorum's assertions and his perspective designed to defend the institutions of our society rather than carve out further corrosions of the society, for special interest groups.

States and state courts have been rolling back restrictions on sodomy for the last 20 years. Apparently the legislatures don't see the stricture or urgency that you do in having a law on the books that is not enforced.

If you're in favor of states retaining the right to proscribe sodomy, I suppose you're also in favor of the states simply ignoring the enforcement of the law.

I just don't see how a law that is not enforced is in anyway effective. If I know the local sheriff will let me go 20 miles over the speed limit, I will, more often than not, go 20 miles over the speed limit.

88 posted on 04/24/2003 1:04:24 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: msimon
What Santorum effectively endorsed was spying on the sex practices of ordinary Americans (how else would such laws be enforced?). In the name of morality of course. That is so false. No one spied on those guys in Texas. A neighbor filed a false report. Otherwise, no one would know.
89 posted on 04/24/2003 1:06:41 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Sooner or later we're gonna have to stop sacrificing leaders on the alter of Political Correctness because, obviously, with each successive sacrifice the Left is further emboldend. Just look at how flimsy the grounds are here compared to the Lott matter. See the pattern? Hoping to slip quietly past the News Mag Cycle misses the point. Damn the News Cycle, at some point someone has to stand and fight!
90 posted on 04/24/2003 1:06:53 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: Dolphy
Correct.
92 posted on 04/24/2003 1:08:08 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: msimon
No, as I recall, it was the gay outrage over the remark, not the content or legal brief it referenced.

As such, it was a concentrated attack and violation of his First Amendment rights.

93 posted on 04/24/2003 1:10:03 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: msimon
Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!
94 posted on 04/24/2003 1:10:06 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Not the point.

His First Amendment rights are being attacked, and he is being harassed and discriminated for his religious beliefs.



95 posted on 04/24/2003 1:11:09 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Get over Lott's demotion. Folks like me who wanted him booted for his supidity did NOT force Lott to say what he said that got broadcast over C-SPAN.

Santorum's case is different in that the fault is squarely with the reporter. Take a look at the links in Post 54.

This reporter has some explaining to do, if you want my opinion. That misquote reflected poorly on Senator Santorum, and given her connection to the campaign manager of one of the Democratic front-runners, I am wonderign what else might be up.
96 posted on 04/24/2003 1:11:37 PM PDT by hchutch (America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

To: msimon
How's this:

"I support the troops, but I don't support the war in Iraq"

compare to:

"I have nothing against homosexuals, but I have a problem with the homosexual act"

What's the difference? Nothing.

Unless you happen to practice a religious faith and happen to be a Republican.

98 posted on 04/24/2003 1:12:49 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Hey Sinkspur. Not too long ago you were condemning in strongest terms homosexual priests. Looks like you changed your tune. Do you believe now that homosexual priests ought not be punished? You were demanding that the bishop open files regarding this behavior, were you not?
99 posted on 04/24/2003 1:13:56 PM PDT by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
That's right! All the tolerance is toward the aberrant Left. There is no tolerance for conservative rhetoric.
100 posted on 04/24/2003 1:14:50 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson