Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
No, that is not the way it is supposed to work. The practicality and suitability of laws is only supposed to be the purvey of the legislature (in conjunction with the Presidential veto authority on the Federal level).

The judiciary is merely supposed to ensure that the constraints on the legislature as described in the Constitution are being adhered to. Nothing more, nothing less.

98 posted on 04/24/2003 9:34:21 AM PDT by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
But because of things like the 14th the courts have to decide on the practicality and suitability also. If a law cannot be equally applied because of the terms used or the thing being legislated (like the virtual kiddie porn laws got killed because nobody could manage to actually define virtual kiddie porn in a consistent manner) then they have to strike it down.
109 posted on 04/24/2003 9:43:55 AM PDT by discostu (I have not yet begun to drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson