Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William McKinley
He is not equating the acts, he is saying that if you pin the rationale for the law on privacy, then the same rationale can be used for the other things.

Exactly so. And I don't see why everyone has to focus on sex. Is unlicensed surgery between consenting adults a private matter? Gambling? Drugs? Just because you do something in the privacy of your own home does not mean that society no longer has an interest. This whole privacy thing REALLY throws out all the rules.

32 posted on 04/24/2003 8:13:46 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley; ClearCase_guy
WILLIAM MCKINLEY WROTE: "He is not equating the acts, he is saying that if you pin the rationale for the law on privacy, then the same rationale can be used for the other things."

CLEARCASE_GUY RESPONDED: "Exactly so. And I don't see why everyone has to focus on sex. Is unlicensed surgery between consenting adults a private matter? Gambling? Drugs? Just because you do something in the privacy of your own home does not mean that society no longer has an interest. This whole privacy thing REALLY throws out all the rules."

You are exactly right, William McKinley and ClearCase_Guy.

The WHOLE POINT is that just because you do something "in the privacy of your own home," DOESN'T MAKE IT LEGAL!

81 posted on 04/24/2003 9:12:39 AM PDT by Concerned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson