To: nessus
NEWWUS WROTE: "More heterosexuals practice "sodomy" than they even ARE homosexuals."
How do YOU know that "more" heterosexuals practice sodomy than heteroseuxals? Are YOU in EVERYONE'S bedroom doing a check of what people regularly do in their bedrooms? Where are your statistics for "more?"
Also, in a monogomous husband-wife relationship, any problem would be contained between them---unless one gives blood---therefore not infecting society.
To: Concerned
I gave my reasons. Size of sample population, acknowledged behavior of same, and at least one study that certainly gives us at least an upper limit.
What have you got that indicates that heterosexuals don't indulge in this behavior?
120 posted on
04/24/2003 10:06:22 AM PDT by
nessus
To: Concerned
NEWWUS WROTE: "More heterosexuals practice "sodomy" than they even ARE homosexuals."
Another thing to note: The old English legal (going back to R.Catholic???) definition of sodomy (basically any sex act not related to reproduction, to put it delicately) are not the sexual acts prohibited in the Bible, which is specifically man to man or woman to woman sex.
Therefore taking a biblical, rather than English law/cultural definition of sodomy, heterosexual sex of any kind cannot be called "sodomy," especially that within marriage.
To: Concerned
NEWWUS WROTE: "More heterosexuals practice "sodomy" than they even ARE homosexuals."
Another thing to note: The old English legal (going back to R.Catholic???) definition of sodomy (basically any sex act not related to reproduction, to put it delicately) is not the same as the sexual acts prohibited in the Bible, which are specifically man to man or woman to woman sex, (or man or woman to beast).
Therefore taking a biblical, rather than English law/cultural definition of sodomy, heterosexual sex of any kind cannot be called "sodomy," especially that within marriage.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson