Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Quake 'Certain' In San Francisco By 2032
Independent (UK) ^ | 4-23-2003 | Andrew Gumbel

Posted on 04/22/2003 3:41:03 PM PDT by blam

Big quake 'certain' in San Francisco by 2032

By Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles
23 April 2003

San Francisco is almost certain to suffer a severe earthquake in the next 30 years, which could uproot tens of thousands of buildings and kill hundreds of people in California's densely populated Bay Area, a detailed study by the United States Geological Survey predicts.

The study, compiled by 100 geologists, disaster management experts, politicians and academics, said there was a 62 per cent chance of a devastating quake with a magnitude of 6.7 or greater on the Richter scale between now and 2032. The chance of an earthquake of magnitude 6.0 or higher was more than 80 per cent.

One earthquake expert, Mary Lou Zoback, told the San Francisco Chronicle: "When you integrate all the estimates over the entire region, a severely damaging quake with a magnitude greater than 6 becomes a certainty."

Fear of the Big One is nothing new for a city devastated by the combined effects of earth tremors and gas fires in 1906. The last major earthquake in the area, in 1989, struck the uninhabited Santa Cruz mountains but still caused havoc in San Francisco, where a motorway flyover flipped over, 63 people died, thousands more were injured and 16,000 buildings were subsequently declared unusable.

The new study comes as the latest bad news for a city that has gone from dotcom boom to bust and watched its tourism business dwindle under the twin pressures of recession and fears of a terrorist attack.

International risk analysts say the prospect of either an earthquake or an attack on a San Francisco landmark, or both, makes the city the most dangerous place in the world. A recent report by Munich Re, a German insurance group, said San Francisco was second only to Tokyo on the list of cities at risk of natural disaster.

When the risk of a terrorist attack is added, the city appears to be an insurer's worst nightmare
(No mention of the AIDS epidemic)


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2032; big; certain; earthquakes; forecasts; francisco; geology; getwhattheydeserve; quake; san; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 04/22/2003 3:41:03 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
I'll mark my calendar.
2 posted on 04/22/2003 3:47:50 PM PDT by SuperSonic (Perception is often not reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Sodom and Gomorrah II?
3 posted on 04/22/2003 3:50:23 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
When this occurs, habitrails will be destroyed, freeing gerbils to rule the Bay area.
4 posted on 04/22/2003 3:51:35 PM PDT by Young Rhino (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
When the Sons of God come forth preaching THE Gospel of the Kingdom, any city that rejects God's final offer of eternal salvation will be wiped off the face of the earth by destructive angels. Until then, San Francisco, and all other cities on the planet, have an excuse to exist. Of course, if they accept the Gospel of the Kingdom, that city will become part of God's new Edenic paradise Kingdom.

Luke 10
8 And into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you:
9 And heal the sick that are therein, and say unto them, The kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.
10 But into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you not, go your ways out into the streets of the same, and say,
11 Even the very dust of your city, which cleaveth on us, we do wipe off against you: notwithstanding be ye sure of this, that the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.
12 But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.

5 posted on 04/22/2003 3:52:10 PM PDT by Russell Scott (The UN is a hellish beast, which gives evil, vile despots a veneer of legitimacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
San Francisco is almost certain to suffer a severe earthquake in the next 30 years...

I've been living in the Bay Area since 1985, and every year since then (and many before) I have heard that the Big One was coming within 30 years. I'm almost 20 years into the first 30 year prediction, apparently with another 30 years to go.

-PJ

6 posted on 04/22/2003 3:52:54 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Already posted from a different source.
7 posted on 04/22/2003 3:53:36 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: xrp
Sodom and Gomorrah II? ....first thing that popped in my mind too!!!
10 posted on 04/22/2003 3:57:03 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
and 16,000 buildings were subsequently declared unusable.

....is this figure right?

12 posted on 04/22/2003 3:59:11 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The new study comes as the latest bad news for a city that has gone from dotcom boom to bust and watched its tourism business dwindle under the twin pressures of recession and fears of a terrorist attack. ....ah, I think they need to add a third pressure, that would be the stench added by the homeless!!!!!!
13 posted on 04/22/2003 4:03:15 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Does it bother anyone else that a newspaper headline describes a 62% chance as "certain"?
14 posted on 04/22/2003 4:03:21 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
We don't want the whole city/metro area to go under, just a some select blocks of the city. That CDC would have much less to deal with.
15 posted on 04/22/2003 4:04:12 PM PDT by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Maybe they were unusable until somebody fixed a broken water pipe, or got the front door unstuck.
16 posted on 04/22/2003 4:05:36 PM PDT by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
"watched its tourism business dwindle under the twin pressures of recession and fears of a terrorist attack."

Oh, is that why the tourism has dwindled. I thought it might have something to do with:

1. Hoards of homeless drug addicts and vagrants badgering people for money on every corner, and urinating/defecating on the streets, in the doorways, in the parks, and in the fountains.

2. A collective group of inhabitants that are so far to the left and outside the bounds of mainstream American values, that most parents wouldn't want their children to witness the freak-shows that pass for residents of San Francisco. Remember, SF decided that taxpayers have to foot the bill for sex change operations for it's "trans-gender" city employees.

3. That SF has become "ground zero" for the (often violent) anti-war/anti-Bush/anti-America protest rallies. Who wants to visit a city where the "peaceniks" are armed with Molotov cocktails and socks full of rocks--and where the city DA releases these criminals after the police arrest them.

4. That SF is a city on the verge of a health meltdown. With rampant AIDS and hepatitis, combined with streets so unsanitary, that the city has taken to spraying them down at night with chlorine bleach (see item 1 above). And SARS is sure to follow.

Hey, I'll take a recession, earthquake, and even terrorists any day compared to the crap that goes on in San Francisco.

17 posted on 04/22/2003 4:09:55 PM PDT by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shawne
you don't consider 1989 big?

Not the way the experts do, as I understand it.

-PJ

18 posted on 04/22/2003 4:12:17 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Queer Capital of the World destroyed. Surely an improvement!
19 posted on 04/22/2003 4:17:02 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
You beat me to it. The little secret that isn't being reported is that I heard these same numbers ten years ago -- 2/3 chance of a big earthquake by 2022.
20 posted on 04/22/2003 4:38:07 PM PDT by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson