People should be able to enjoy the freedom of having a smoke - but other people should enjoy the freedom of not having to smell it.
7 posted on
04/22/2003 2:22:20 PM PDT by
kever
To: kever
Thats easy. let them open their own establishments.
9 posted on
04/22/2003 2:26:52 PM PDT by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: kever
Then don't patronize an establishment that allows it. We should, as should the business owners, have the right to do so if we so wish.
10 posted on
04/22/2003 2:27:12 PM PDT by
kissthis
To: kever
"People should be able to enjoy the freedom of having a smoke - but other people should enjoy the freedom of not having to smell it."
Agreed. I have a friend who owns a bar in Florida and guess what; he does not force non-smokers in there at gunpoint.
14 posted on
04/22/2003 2:34:06 PM PDT by
Beck_isright
("We created underarm deodorant, and the French turned that down too."-Mitch Daniels, Budget Director)
To: kever
The solution to that is simple....allow the bars and restaurants to decide for themselves whether they want to be smoking or non-smoking. Both sides will have places to go with no one being stepped on.
To: kever
but other people should enjoy the freedom of not having to smell it. There has to be room on this earth for all of us. Just because you don't agree with someone's lifestyle, that doesnt make you right in wanting to change it. Live and let live.
48 posted on
04/23/2003 7:11:25 AM PDT by
SheLion
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson