Posted on 04/21/2003 4:32:34 PM PDT by Polycarp
GOP Courting Homosexual Vote -- A 'Recipe for Disaster' By Bill Fancher and Jody Brown (AgapePress) - When Republican National Committee Chairman Mark Racicot met with homosexual activists recently, it caused a chorus of criticism from the pro-family lobby across the country.
Bob Knight of the Culture and Family Institute says Racicot's address at a Human Rights Campaign meeting in early March is the latest in a series of apparent efforts by the Bush Administration to court the homosexual vote. Knight believes the GOP has been misguided about its pro-family Christian voter base.
"I think there is a view in the White House that somehow Christian conservatives will stay in the GOP camp no matter what they do on the homosexual issue -- and that if they promote homosexuality, that will give them a look of compassion among, say, suburban housewives," he says.
"Somebody is feeding them exactly the wrong advice: to move to the left on homosexual activism."
Knight calls this strategy "a recipe for disaster" and maintains the pro-family Christian voters will not accept this compromise. Saying it will not go unnoticed by conservatives in the GOP, he laments: "Some GOP leaders seem intent on cutting off their right arm in order to reach out with their left."
He suggests Christians start returning contribution requests with a note saying they will contribute only when the GOP changes its pro-homosexual policy. © 2003 AgapePress all rights reserved.
April 21, 2003
RNC Leader Racicot Meets with Homosexual Lobby Group
4/9/2003
By Peter LaBarbera
Promises ‘Tolerance,’ No 'Gay-Baiting' Political Ads in HRC Meeting
Republican National Committee Chair Marc Racicot spoke to a gathering of 300 homosexual activists in a meeting organized by the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s leading “gay” pressure group, on March 7 in Washington, D.C.
But an RNC spokesman downplayed the significance of the appearance event in an interview with Culture & Family Report.
According to one “gay” activist who attended the meeting — which the homosexual newspaper The Washington Blade reports was closed to the press — Racicot disavowed “gay-baiting” political ads for GOP candidates endorsed by the RNC. His spokesman Dan Ronayne reportedly told The Blade that Racicot was "honored" to address the HRC activists to express "our party's commitment to tolerance and inclusion."
The former governor of Montana, who gained national attention as the spokesman for George W. Bush during the Florida election crisis in 2000, has a history of pro-homosexual advocacy in his home state. But his appearance at the HRC event set a precedent for the national party. It was the first time the leader of the RNC addressed a homosexual group.
Racicot’s appearance before HRC—which has endorsed scores of mostly Democratic candidates over the years, and which supports homosexual “marriage” and “transgender” rights—is the latest sign that GOP elites are abandoning the party’s “family values” stance opposing homosexual activism. In recent months, some GOP leaders such as New York Gov. George Pataki have stepped up their support for pro-homosexual legislation.
"Some GOP leaders seem intent on cutting off their right arm in order to reach out with their left," said Robert Knight, director of CWA's Culture & Family Institute. "This is foolish and will not go unnoticed by the party's conservative grassroots.
"Mr. Racicot needs to clarify exactly what he means by 'gay-baiting.' Would this mean disavowing Oklahoma Senator Jim Inhofe's 1994 campaign slogan, 'God, Gays, and Guns,' in which Mr. Inhofe staunchly defended family values?" Knight asked.
The 2000 GOP platform opposes “gay marriage,” homosexuals in the military, and supports the right of the Boy Scouts to reject homosexual scoutmasters.
Racicot’s spokesman, Dan Ronayne, reportedly told The Blade, “Governor Racicot believes the most important obligation we have as a party is to engage with all of our citizens in respectful and insightful dialogue to explain and debate our positions. … The Human Rights Campaign luncheon was a wonderful opportunity to do just that."
Veteran Bladereporter Lou Chibbaro Jr. writes: “Ronayne added that Racicot was ‘honored’ to speak before the HRC event and to address ‘our party's commitment to tolerance and inclusion.’”
RNC Spokesman Downplays Remarks
In an interview with Culture & Family Report, another RNC spokesman, Jim Dyke, downplayed the homosexual-affirming quotations attributed to his boss, Mr. Racicot.
Dyke said Racicot attended the HRC event because he meets with “lots of organizations and individuals to discuss the President’s compassionate conservative agenda, including his commitment to strengthen America’s families.”
When told that many pro-family advocates will find Racicot’s HRC visit troubling because they believe the “gay” lobby group actually is undermining and “redefining the American family,” Dyke said Racicot met with the group mainly to “listen,” and not to make “promises and pledges.”
Asked about Racicot’s reported comment in the Blade disavowing “‘gay-baiting’ ads in Republican election campaigns under [Racicot’s] control,” Dyke said that did not refer to ads in which GOP candidates defended the Boy Scouts’ right to prohibit homosexual scout leaders (which Georgia GOP candidate—and now senator—Saxby Chambliss did, helping him to defeat incumbent Democrat Sen. Max Cleleland).
“Standing up for the Boy Scouts of America is a right of free association and part of President Bush’s compassionate conservative agenda and standing up for American families,” Dyke said.
Not Really ‘Honored’?
Dyke downplayed the remark attributed to Racicot (by HRC spokesman David Smith) that he was “honored” to appear at the HRC luncheon.
“I would say [Racicot] was ‘honored’ in the sense he was honored in his position [as RNC chair] to take the President’s compassionate conservative position to lots of organizations and individuals,” Dyke said.
Although he did not attend the HRC event with Racicot, Dyke said he would not characterize it as a “speech.” He said he did not know how the decision was made to attend the event. HRC endorsed George W. Bush’s opponent, Al Gore, in the 2000 presidential election, and has featured Mr. Gore (and his wife Tipper) at HRC fundraisers.
Dyke also sought to minimize the significance of the comment attributed to Racicot (by his own spokesman, Dan Ronayne) that he was at the HRC luncheon to address “our party’s commitment to tolerance and inclusion."
“Regardless of what Dan said—and I’m not setting out to hang one of my guys out to dry—the reason [Racicot] went to the meeting was to discuss the president’s compassionate conservative agenda.”
Homosexual Praise
Patrick Guerriero, who attended the event as executive director of The Log Cabin Republicans, a homosexual activist group, said of Racicot's HRC appearance:
This is another signal that the new Republican Party under George Bush's leadership is reaching out to all groups of Americans. ... I think his remarks were honest and real and indicate a new willingness of the Republican Party to reach out to folks, including gays.
HRC spokesman David Smith said Racicot's visit to his organization "shows that the Republican Party is changing and becoming more accepting of gays. ... This is an example of how President Bush is moving the party to reflect his vision of the party."
Take Action
To reach the Republican National Committee and RNC Chair Marc Racicot, call or write:
Marc Racicot, RNC, 310 First St. SE, Washington, DC 20003
Phone: 202-863-8500
www.rnc.org
To contact President George Bush, call: 202-456-1414, or visit www.whitehouse.gov
"I think there is a view in the White House that somehow Christian conservatives will stay in the GOP camp no matter what they do on the homosexual issue"
That's called the sin of presumption.
Some in the GOP desperately desire to marginalize social/Christian conservatives.
One way to do that is move so far to the center that social conservatives are forced to find a third party that is not wholly at odds with their beliefs.
Then both the "moderate" GOPs and the Dems will have succeeded in eliminating social conservatives as a constituency they must patronize with an occasional bone.
And they know there will not be enough that go over to a third party to actually challenge the two party monopoly on politics in this country.
The fix will be in when the GOP quietly abandons the pro-life plank. As can be seen here, they're already abandoning family values in embracing the homosexual movement.
I confidently predict the GOP will abandon the pro-life plank by 2008.
You know this ... how?
Perhaps not the best choice of spokespersons for items of this nature.
You know this ... how?I read it in a magazine. Of course I was getting buggered senseless at the time. It was the least I could do. He picked up the check and all.
I disagree, at least to a degree. It will depend just as much upon who wins the struggle for the soul of the GOP, social conservatives or "moderate" RINOs.
RINOs will purge social conservatives regardless, if they are able, because in the end they share the same motivations and goals as Dems.
I have no problem with Republicans trying to make clear that they're no enemy of people who merely wish to be lift alone to interact with other, fully-consenting, adults. They must, however, stand firm against any recognition of "gay rights" which go beyond that and beyond those rights enjoyed by anyone else (e.g. gays have every right to be just as protected against battery as anyone else).
If Republicans can take a firm stance there, they stand to win a great many votes not only from homosexuals, but also from "homosexual sympathizers" who currently vote Democratic to protect the "victim class" of gays.
And the difference between them and "moderate" Republicans is....?
Some do, but not all. Right now, though, gays feel compeled to vote as a Democrat bloc. Republicans need to break that. See my next post...
Now pro-family voters don't provide enough votes to keep the RNC machine moving? Okay, I give up. Why not just go where all the votes are and drop the whole "conservative" pretense and we can all be liberals, or the indistinguishable "fashionably moderate?" After all, Bill Clinton got votes--he was elected twice. If you can't beat them, join them, and be part of the "winning team." I guess that's what Rove and his RNC liasons are doing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.