Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
There have been no quarters of negative growth under Bush Two.

This statement is false on its face. The first three quarters of 2001 were all characterized by negative GDP.

23 posted on 04/20/2003 8:13:46 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv; Hillary'sMoralVoid; All
For easy reference from the Bureau of Economic Analysis - National Income and Product Accounts Tables

Table 1.2. Real Gross Domestic Product
[Billions of chained (1996) dollars] Seasonally adjusted at annual rates

Line      1999   
I
   1999   
II
   1999   
III
   1999   
IV
   2000   
I
   2000   
II
   2000   
III
   2000   
IV
   2001   
I
   2001   
II
   2001   
III
   2001   
IV
   2002   
I
   2002   
II
   2002   
III
   2002   
IV
1  Real GDP 8,733.2 8,775.5 8,886.9 9,040.1 9,097.4 9,205.7 9,218.7 9,243.8 9,229.9 9,193.1 9,186.4 9,248.8 9,363.2 9,392.4 9,485.6 9,518.2

Caution on the use of chained-dollar NIPA estimates

26 posted on 04/20/2003 10:03:12 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson