Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Scott Peterson is Innocent'
Time Magazine ^ | April 20, 2003 | JILL UNDERWOOD

Posted on 04/20/2003 1:08:30 PM PDT by tessalu

In an exclusive on-line interview with Time's San Diego reporter, Jill Underwood, Scott Peterson's mother Jackie and father Lee defended their son against allegations that he murdered his pregnant wife, Laci. Excepts from their conversation:

Lee Peterson: We're grieving for the loss of Scott's wife and the baby. Our family is just devastated, and we feel an equal amount of pain for the Rocha family — Sharon and Ron and the whole family. But... our son is innocent. We know that. We've known it from day one.

Jackie Peterson: They know it too. They supported him fully until the police misled them, and that was to divide and separate him from them. He was their support. They were his support.

Lee Peterson: We're just very critical of the way the Modesto police has handled this investigation. They worked strictly on a theory that was dreamt up by this lead detective within the first eight hours, and they've pursued it backward from there and they have neglected so many good leads. Chief (Roy) Wasden made a comment during his news conference that on the evening before Christmas Eve, Laci's mother had spoken to Laci at 8:15 and that's the last time anyone saw Laci. Not true. There are several people who saw Laci.

Jackie Peterson: Several people who the police immediately tried to discredit the minute they came forward, so they're not coming forward.

Lee Peterson: And one of these gentlemen — and they are prominent people — he's a three-term council member up there and an attorney, and they saw her and they know her and the police have disregarded this. If it doesn't fit their theory, by God, they don't want to investigate it. I just can't be any more emphatic than that. And we're gonna pursue this thing.

Jackie Peterson: I would like people to use their common sense and look at the big picture, not just one incident that for three months the police have been telling them Scott did not go fishing. Now conveniently, the body has been found where he told them he went fishing. Why would he go 80 miles fishing, come home with a receipt and buy gas and food along the way, have a receipt of the dock and tell the police exactly where he went fishing — and the body would be there! That does not make sense. It's too damn inconvenient for that.

Lee Peterson: I would ask everyone to consider Scott's family. We're a good family. We don't have a record of anything.

Jackie Peterson: He doesn't either. You can look.

Lee Peterson: He doesn't. There was no domestic violence.

Jackie Peterson: No drugs. No financial problems. He worked three jobs to put himself through college and put his wife through college. They both worked hard to get everything they had, and they were enjoying it to the hilt. And they adored each other.

Lee Peterson: We were with them the week before Christmas, and you never saw a more loving couple.

Jackie Peterson: Laci's mother stated the same thing prior to the police going to them. All her family talked about how much they loved each other. How happy they were. How happily married people they were. And how we all wished we were like that. And then it all changed when the police went to them. And with what we know now, now they're bragging about their technique of deception that they learned to be detectives. And that means they can lie to you but if you say anything in the same sentence different, you've committed perjury. But they can say anything they want and tell their parents anything they want and they're grieving and they're looking to them for help.

TIME: What has Scott told you?

Lee Peterson: We haven't been able to speak to him. Again, we're grieving for the baby as Scott is for Laci. And we'd like to extend our best to the Rocha family. But I think if they search their hearts and really position themselves where they were before the police deceived them, and look at this thing in the wide context, they'll see the police have just bungled this investigation from day one. They can come after me. That's fine. But they've bungled this case.

Jackie Peterson: I think it's inappropriate for the police to be preening and patting themselves on the back for a good job of four months when they've done a cheap shot ... is what they've performed. Not only that, but they were preening and patting themselves when the announcement of who those bodies were. That's totally inappropriate. If they want to pat themselves on the back, they should have a party somewhere else. I'm just appalled at that, that our public people are like that. You have a district attorney calling this a slam-dunk before there's even an arraignment. I'm feeling like I'm living in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union. I've just sick of this. (Her eyes are tearing up.) I think every man out there should be in fear if this is the way the police worked. If a crime happens to your wife, you'd better know you're with six people and they weren't drunk and they are good friends who are going to be able to put up with this. If they have any kind of shady character, the police will dismiss them and you'll be ruined.

TIME: What about the police saying that Scott tried to sell the house and her car?

Lee Peterson: You can take this thing from the very beginning. There's no motive. That $250,000 life insurance policy they had for two years and it was on each of them. They did that when they bought the home.

Jackie Peterson: It's not a policy. It was a retirement policy that has insurance attached. (The police) lied to Laci Peterson's mother about that.

Lee Peterson: He did not try to sell the house.

Jackie Peterson: We were looking at new cars the week before in Carmel. Laci wanted a safer car for her baby. The police took his car. He's making a payment on a truck that they've had now for four months. He's not a rich man. He works and they live the way they want to live, but they budgeted and they do it on their own and they never ask for anything.

Lee Peterson: They made it sound like Laci loved that car. Laci hated that car.

Jackie Peterson: She called it a piece of shit. The only time I ever heard a bad word out of her mouth.

Lee Peterson: We talked a lot driving on the Carmel trip the week before this happened, and they were gonna trade that car and get her a better car. Because the car would quit running.... As for the home, one of the ladies who ran our volunteer center in Modesto is in the real estate business. And she was one of favorites. ... And Scott was talking to her as a side remark and said "What do you think I could get for it."

Jackie Peterson: That's not what he said. He said, he didn't want to live there anymore. He said he didn't want to bring Laci home to that and what would they get out of it. He did not sign a listing. He did not go to a realtor.

Lee Peterson: Did you folks know that there's another pregnant lady that was floating in that bay in January? Another torso and two other pregnant women missing in that area. And that place is polluted with parolees.

TIME: What about the fear that police had that he would run to Mexico?

Jackie Peterson: I will tell you exactly what happened. He sold his car because his job has changed. He doesn't have to haul stuff anymore. And he couldn't afford it. He was making a payment, and we loaned him a car to drive instead. Apparently from what we now hear, the police had a device attached to it. His attorney knew where he was at all times. We talked to him every day. And the police asked us if we'd talk to him and we'd say, "Yes, we talk to him at least once a day." Sometimes, when they called, we hadn't talked to him that day yet. But he called us every night because we feared for his life because of how they've polluted this story. How the press and police have jumped on every little thing and made it what it's not. That's the story on that. They lost him.

Lee Peterson: He went to Mexico as you'll recall, maybe six weeks ago, on a business trip, came back and the police knew where he was.

Jackie Peterson: He's not going to leave his family and his life, and besides he's innocent.

Lee Peterson: It's another smear on him that he was going to run into Mexico. And how ridiculous. The kid lives here. They ran him out of Modesto. He can't use his home. They've got his car. Where's he supposed to go? He came to us and he was not running.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: connerpeterson; lacipetersen; murder; scottpetersen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-267 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: tessalu
Time loves reporting this and I am sure that the N.O. of Women are screaming about the baby being considered a murder.
62 posted on 04/20/2003 2:09:16 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frostbit
Innocent people want a full, complete, and accurate investigation and will cooperate fully with authorities, knowing that the truth will show them to be uninvolved.

Peterson's a narcissistic personality. The only thing a pathological narcissist thinks about is immediate gratification.

Narcissists will put their own lives and well-being at risk for the gratification they seek. Baby on the way? If that interferes with my affair, I'll just kill the baby and its mother.

DNA announcement about to be made when I want to go play golf? I'll go play golf.

Peterson, like Clinton, never thought he'd get caught, even though he made so many mistakes he was bound to. Narcissists can't possibly think objectively, and don't understand what the fuss is. Isn't all of life about immediate gratification?

Like Clinton, he will eventually confess.

63 posted on 04/20/2003 2:10:52 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Ping.... ( didn't know if I should use your whole list or not. grin)
64 posted on 04/20/2003 2:13:10 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Like Clinton, he will eventually confess.

I pray that he will if guilty. I'd be curious to know if he got someone else to do the deed for him... there's no blood and guts in his boat.

65 posted on 04/20/2003 2:14:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Nazi Germany???
66 posted on 04/20/2003 2:14:43 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I pray that he will if guilty.

He's guilty. Most wives killed are killed by their husbands.

I'd be curious to know if he got someone else to do the deed for him... there's no blood and guts in his boat.

Have you seen the galoot? He's a big boy. He likely strangled her and hauled her out to the marina.

This boy's gonna have a very hard time in general population.

67 posted on 04/20/2003 2:17:39 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Was that before or after Scott told her that he was having an affair?

Those are his words. We don't really know if he ever really told her. I would bet he didn't. Why tell her when you know you're going to kill her anyway?

68 posted on 04/20/2003 2:18:36 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LoveBushLongTime
I have to think that if the MPD arrested Scott, they must have quite a bit of evidence stacked against him.

This could be right, but they could also fully believe they could convict him of anything now. Look at this thread: there isn't many here who don't already think he did it. Nobody here investigated, they are all taking the word of the police department and other known information. The DA may feel they have not only a good but great chance to get a conviction just because of the moood of the public.

I hope for justice's sake three things: one, the scenario I described above is not the case and they believe they honestly have the evidence that leads them to believe he did it; two, if he did do it, he gets the gas chamber; and three, if he didn't do it, he gets acquitted and the DA and police face some sort of review to explain why they focused on the guy that didn't do it and ignored anyone else that did.

69 posted on 04/20/2003 2:20:29 PM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

I hope the cops did not botch this investigation, since SP seems to be guilty as sin.

By reading this article, it seems that the cops are neglecting leads and discarding witnesses that do not fit a rigid scenario.

70 posted on 04/20/2003 2:20:35 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
He had motive (money troubles and a girlfriend on the side) and opportunity. The body floats up a couple miles from where he went fishing - which was pretty darn far from where he lives. She didn't get out there by herself. So either one of two things have happened here.

(1) He killed her. He is a typical scumbag who killed his pregnant wife so he could get the insurance and shack up with his girlfriend.

(2) He has been cleverly framed by someone who knows his habits well and hates him. In this context, having a girlfriend on the side just makes him an a**hole, not a murderer. Having the body float up where he goes fishing would be key to the frame -- although highly unrealistic because since the body was apparently wired to weights to stay down.

It will be interesting to see his defense -- yeah, it was the one-armed man! So unless it turns out that a bunch of other pregnant gals who also show signs of being wired down have also floated ashore (in which case, all bets are off) he is toast.

71 posted on 04/20/2003 2:21:49 PM PDT by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
It's hard to imagine how his attorney can defend his actions.

I remember a story Scott's mom told papers early on, about how when Scott was a teenager, he told her he had helped two different people start their cars that were alongside the road. Both people sent letters to his parents to thank their son.

Now, it sure seems odd to me that both of these people would have asked him for his address, and sent letters. I thought he probably wrote them himself, or had a friend do it-that both times, he was late home, or somewhere he wasn't supposed to be & used the stranded car stories as a cover. Could be way off base, but the story just sounded strange. (Story was, if I recall, "Who is Scott Peterson", perhaps from MSNBC site).

72 posted on 04/20/2003 2:22:28 PM PDT by uvular
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
Screen scroll on FOX says Police press conference on Laci Peterson case shortly.

So9

73 posted on 04/20/2003 2:23:06 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
And one of these gentlemen — and they are prominent people — he's a three-term council member up there and an attorney, and they saw her and they know her and the police have disregarded this. If it doesn't fit their theory, by God, they don't want to investigate it. I just can't be any more emphatic than that. And we're gonna pursue this thing.

83 year old Bill Mitchell, who said he was looking for the bowl game that was on that day. None were scheduled for 12/24, pro or college it's well documented.

74 posted on 04/20/2003 2:24:54 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
By reading this article, it seems that the cops are neglecting leads and discarding witnesses that do not fit a rigid scenario.

I'll bet we don't know the half of what the cops have got.

Peterson made so many mistakes that we've seen (an affair offers motive, the bodies float up right where he was fishing which was 90 miles from his house); the cops said they were going to indict and arrest him even before the bodies were found.

75 posted on 04/20/2003 2:25:04 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
But... our son is innocent

ok then free scott peterson he is innocent his parents said so
76 posted on 04/20/2003 2:26:09 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Why did Scottie sell her SUV, and why was he in the process of changing his appearance? But, what else do you expect these poor deluded people to say? That their son is a murderer?

I imagine he had to sell the SUV to pay bills. I haven't heard if he lost his job or not since this became a story a few months ago. As for his appearance, if my mug were on the news channels 24/7, I'd probably want to look a little different too, guilty or not.

77 posted on 04/20/2003 2:27:12 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Why would Scott talk about going to the water at all, had he taken Laci's body out there in a tarp and dumped it? There were no witnesses. Why would he place himself at the general scene of the crime?
78 posted on 04/20/2003 2:28:20 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: uvular
Now, it sure seems odd to me that both of these people would have asked him for his address, and sent letters.

Or, more likely, his mother's a liar, and Scott learned well from her.

Having watched them on MSNBC (and you can probably catch this throughout the evening), these parents are creepy.

79 posted on 04/20/2003 2:28:39 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: uvular
It's hard to imagine how his attorney can defend his actions.

Even Geoffrey Feiger was saying that he has incriminated himself big time.

80 posted on 04/20/2003 2:29:33 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson