Posted on 04/20/2003 12:25:36 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
What the heck! WHo gave it a name like that!!??
Her Presidential run will never happen. She doesn't stand a chance with the voters of New York, again, let alone the entire country
She'll be re-elected with the largest margin ever. Hillary is a known liar, she even lied about her name, said she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, even though she was born before he became famous. Slick is a pathological liar. Lying and getting away with it is a plus to the mainstream media and the liberal elite.
Craig Crawford, Congressional Quarterly, is a regular guest on Batchelor and Alexander. He insists that Hillary's going to waltz into the Democrat primary at the very last second and save the day. He also thinks she would beat Dubya, and to that end, he's delusional.
My guess is this is the beginning of the end, because this is one of her own...
I suggest that this has happened because she got on the armed services committee.
The clintons, the CIA and the mob play hardball, but NO ONE, NO ONE, screws with the DOD.
Not Presidents, not kings, and not little self absorbed senators.
Getting on that committee crossed the line, she became a threat to the defense department, and these fellows deal in death, and if they think you challange the internal defenses of the United States of America, you go away.
The Department of Defense will put up with a lot, but it's like a religous organization passed down from generation to generation since the WWII....they let America and it's people pretty much do what they want, even the Mob. But don't kid yourself.
They take the defense of this country very series, and they have sent old crsuty a message, and it's:
You are never going to be our Commander in Chief
and since WWII if they don't want you, you're gone.
Cross them, and you're gone, whether you're a president or a pawn.
Yeah, maybe the rumor is true, but then again, it *is* coming from Brill and this could all be more of the same old Clintonian "float a nasty rumor that we can easily disprove" trick to garner the sympathy vote.
As in, there is no way that Schumer is going to publicly affirm this rumor, and very good odds that he will denounce the rumor.
If Schumer denounces this rumor at a crucial time in next year's Presidential election, then Hillary will gain an enormous 9/11 sympathy vote popularity boost.
Consider motive (re: this rumor). There are only two possible outcomes, too. Either this rumor is true or false. Now, Conservatives have NO NEED for this rumor to be true, as we already have enough dirt on Hillary; moreover, Hillary's national popularity is no current threat to GWB.
Thus, we stand to gain NOTHING if this rumor is true.
On the other hand, if this rumor is angrily denounced by Schumer and the media during a critical time in next year's election cycle, then Hillary and the Democrats stand to gain a TREMENDOUS sympathy backlash boost.
Thus, they stand to gain one way and can't lose even if it goes the other way. It's a classic "heads I win, tails you lose" proposition.
...And it's coming from Brill, a known Clinton fan.
In the immortal words of Star Wars: "It's a trap!"
Yep, you got that right!!
The truth about DENNIS= http://www.kucinich.com "A Flip-Flopping Liberal Extremist".
|
"Free Republic is one of those groups obsessed with the Clinton era." Word's out: Protest at Hillary's tonight
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.